Allow me to offer some commentary on several SCOTUS cases that are NOT the #moab, but which, considered in aggregate, will reveal my impressions on the #TRUMPSMASH #lawOfFunny

Can someone give me a google number or something? I want a party line.
https://t.co/SlJCsjWMUa
I'm sorry, but #lawOFFunny #nominologicaldeterminism.

#thomists
This one is important: https://t.co/oXMl5k1eLe
ah screw it let's look at the pretty #moab

https://t.co/wCiwCJGkbX
There's no question SCOTUS will accept the case. And @toad_spotted look at how they set up and use all the stuff re: bellwethers, polling, # of votes, etc. "it's no surprise" -- that's how you set up red flags talk. Not here to argue, just the facts and "it's no surprise".
Notice how each paragraph here answers questions people may have at the outset, leading you down the funnel of persuasion into the final bit: a concrete focus on the unprecedented changes in mail-ins. (Spoiler alert: this is leading to conspiracy charges against the DNC.)
Two movies: when the facts come out about chicom infiltration and just how dirty our #blindpolyphemus CIA has been, all the little hints like the highlighted phrase below will snap into sharp focus. #lawOfFunny
(Recall: Trump has access to state of the art real-time data on both covid and the election numbers. His NSA also has the entire internet tapped moment to moment, so they can compare any two moments to trace any info manipulators. The coverup thus evidences the crime.)
(Recall also that Trump, like me and many others, has known the Crowdstrike assessment of the DNC hack was a coverup job, and he also knew who was involved and what they were covering up.)
(sorry, the DNC "hack".)
Cf.
https://t.co/SZJ1Sw0GxM
Powerful one-two punch: we've got clear evidence of fraud, even if only in spoliation, but by the way, we don't actually have to prove fraud. That's what I've been trying to convey about the structure of this thing for some time #lawOfFunny
Note that, with both POTUS and the States present in the court, it would be a perfect time to look at some of Justice's Thomas's dissents re: the scope of the 14th Amendment.
intermezzo - the story of the @peregrimmer ban

https://t.co/rw6rSAIysY
Lot of misconceptions on this point.

https://t.co/1Ww7SI3g28
Here's the October 1 prediction thread again.

https://t.co/zdNrEfmJ1l

#lawOfFunny

See why you want to archive?
Oh wait, here's that first part again @BrennanCenter
That's not what @peregrimmer got suspended for, though, And he didn't get suspended for trolling or using naughty language or breaking any of the identified Twitter Rules, now did he, @jack?
Before getting to what @peregrimmer got banned for, and why the ban feeds into her plan to use art projects to generate lawsuits against media companies, let's take a poll. Compared to October 1, how are you feeling about #lawOfFunny ?
(also, yes, @RafaelEnder1, I have an archive of stuff from Twitter, but I'm a space-cadet and lazy and I'm sort of making a point with this art project about the social nature of history and collective memory, so I ask everyone to make their own #archive #PLEASEARCHIVE)

More from Trump

OK, #Squidigation fans, I think we need to talk about the new Wisconsin suit Donald Trump filed - personally - in Federal Court last night. The suit is (as usual) meritless. But it's meritless in new and disturbing ways. This thread will be


Not, I hope, Seth Abramson long. But will see.

I apologize in advance to my wife, who would very much prefer I be billing time (today's a light day, though) and to my assistant, to whom I owe some administrative stuff this will likely keep me from 😃

First, some background. Trump's suit essentially tries to Federalize the Wisconsin Supreme Court complaint his campaign filed, which we discussed here.


If you haven't already, go read that thread. I'm not going to be re-doing the same analysis, and I'm not going to be cross-linking to that discussion as we go. (Sorry, I like you guys, and I see this as public service, but there are limits)

Also, @5DollarFeminist has a good stand-alone thread analyzing the new Federal complaint - it's worth reading as well, though some of the analysis will overlap.
To those who want to actually help Claudia Conway after her mom (Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s former aide) posted her underage daughter’s nudes to Fleets, fill out a report on the NCMEC CyberTipline.
CPS refused to help her.
#HelpClaudia


Kellyanne Conway has a well-documented history of verbally abusing, gaslighting, and threatening her daughter. It gets worse when highly public things go viral (such as exposing the truth about Trump and Conway catching COVID-19 last October). Kellyanne coerces false statements.

Insider did a thorough chronological background of the history of exposing her parents abuse and control of her here:
https://t.co/ncjaEyLOSC

We all know that “statement” last year was coerced. She talks constantly about being abused by them.


Personally? I suspect Kellyanne is a narcissist. From my own experience being sexually and emotionally abused by a narcissist, they are obsessed with controlling the narrative (coerced typed statement), discrediting their victim (posting her nudes) & gaslighting

If you haven’t experienced gaslighting or aren’t familiar with it, it’s when someone causing you harm (physical, emotional, sexual, financial, etc) twists the facts and asserts that reality is just you being delusional and you don’t actually understand what happened.

You May Also Like

Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q