Trump: Day 1,407 (THREAD)
-13,454,254 Cases of COVID-19 in US
-US CV-19 Death Toll Rises to 271,026
-Day 20 Since Biden Declared Winner
-Day 424 at a Trump-owned Property
-Touts Assassination of Iran Scientist
-Appointed Judge Rejects PA Lawsuit
-$3M Recount Increases Biden Lead

https://t.co/hOfTV6hRNx
https://t.co/KYBIm6Qohw
https://t.co/Bj5tluZ5dh
https://t.co/Q9YG4btKvH
https://t.co/G1IgMJoDRj
https://t.co/jqUVgK658u
https://t.co/PjhZwRPE8n
https://t.co/S0I2HB8Gt6
https://t.co/5Etk0CVJKF
https://t.co/Nx0UuPvtg0
https://t.co/u7gX9H1bnU
As coronavirus cases continue to skyrocket across our nation recording record numbers, here's the following states that recorded 4,000 or more new cases, today.
https://t.co/9BH2sZizmG
https://t.co/Z3keTBJWCH
https://t.co/KgeBK7zZki
https://t.co/gpzTSBQ6zf
https://t.co/rPAr4Uv2tT
https://t.co/rI76go5S4u
https://t.co/t38seXzLTI
https://t.co/p2rGBprrat
https://t.co/7qr6xhv6xs
https://t.co/GzeHGM62fn
https://t.co/n18CBw8pnn
https://t.co/K8q7WUpEmF
https://t.co/paBIlSiUaG
https://t.co/7BcWLKSbAM
https://t.co/o13IrIa4ZH
https://t.co/Ef80vgRNKn
https://t.co/ILnNPUL9aR
https://t.co/N4Ya0K3zmo
https://t.co/M6SeGtNsJD
https://t.co/R3qLlj6IZM
https://t.co/vEpZqNSqOC
https://t.co/YlUjgkzSPi
https://t.co/u5waj8O5br
https://t.co/KWj2aSmbZ3
https://t.co/Cfzzaabbw2
https://t.co/3NsIhG5ze8
https://t.co/eqCxIqdj5j
https://t.co/ag3efTn5k4
https://t.co/JTjTLhsrjo
https://t.co/SZbCd4bh1J
https://t.co/OBOxRsnInw
https://t.co/AQb6smyBUr
https://t.co/4KfBeI1jQI
https://t.co/qCqZhrpDGM
https://t.co/Loo3DQZy3d
https://t.co/G34tor7Htp
https://t.co/ZFB942zARs
https://t.co/hXLTPiLwPr
https://t.co/PC2SWnX19D
https://t.co/n0TBtD7KFM
https://t.co/w3F81ozYSe
https://t.co/53qhgkjkb4
https://t.co/2GNloYmiid
https://t.co/FyzNtYbrFo
https://t.co/CaNaMQ7alg
https://t.co/wweueMmf4Y
https://t.co/Db6YPP1qKc
https://t.co/43YAxa1RHV
https://t.co/ylDXVP0snp

More from Trump

This is mostly right but strikes me as it needing said that I don't think the left or the intelligentsia have the slightest idea how low institutional trust in anything coming from a left mouthpiece is now. Except in-network, the best heuristic is "the opposite of what they said"


If you look at the situation from a predictive models perspective instead of the more rigorous and appropriate (under normal circumstances) "prove your case or gtfo" perspective, trusting the opposite of whatever the left side says has an AMAZING track record, as we know it.

Literally, the best heuristic most people have right now, in terms of how often it gets things right versus *completely* wrong, is "whatever CNN, the NYT, public health officials, and the Democrats said... yeah, the opposite." That is, they're wrong WAY outside of statistics.

They're also not just wrong. They're *completely* wrong, backwards, often transparently covering something up that they don't want known or refuse to believe. This isn't just a legitimation crisis because there's a heuristic: whatever the official left narrative is, is wrong.

There are a few reasons why such a heuristic would be more predictive than not. One of those is conspiracy, and another is mass hysteria with ideological capture. We know at least one of those is happening and have rather strong evidence both are. That makes conspiracy reasonable

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.