Mini thread of my strategy.
Disclaimer: I truly don’t feel qualified to share “my strategy”. There are other better experienced traders you should listen to. But here’s what I trade: MOMENTUM, FLOW & CNBC pump 😃
More from Tradingthread
My threads, data, tools I use, investment philosophy and frequently asked questions. Please review these links.
1. Overview
https://t.co/p2gjgPvhHG
2. Investing Process
https://t.co/ZpJeN0JiSV
3. Tools I use and
4. Market Analysis https://t.co/Ol9POhXMiV
5. Due diligence and deep dives on stocks
https://t.co/0oTNNsXuwr
6. General
7. My ongoing
8. List of about 20+ email newsletters in investing / technology and self help that I would
9. I do a lot of writing about IPOs and like to research new companies.
You can follow my writing and subscribe (Free) at
1. Overview
https://t.co/p2gjgPvhHG
2. Investing Process
https://t.co/ZpJeN0JiSV
3. Tools I use and
4. Market Analysis https://t.co/Ol9POhXMiV
5. Due diligence and deep dives on stocks
https://t.co/0oTNNsXuwr
6. General
7. My ongoing
8. List of about 20+ email newsletters in investing / technology and self help that I would
9. I do a lot of writing about IPOs and like to research new companies.
You can follow my writing and subscribe (Free) at
A mega thread, this contains some of my popular threads which may help you in your trading.
Thanks for reading :)
Pyramiding
Don't change your trading
Trendlines
Scaling in-out
Thanks for reading :)
Pyramiding
A thread on Pyramiding- pic.twitter.com/8EOSSFMZ2w
— Trader knight (@Traderknight007) December 27, 2020
Don't change your trading
"Don't change the trading rules after every trade."
— Trader knight (@Traderknight007) November 29, 2020
If you do change them frequently then this thread is for you.
Let's talk about the law of large numbers and how it benefits traders to be profitable.
[Thread]\U0001f447\U0001f447\U0001f447 pic.twitter.com/pEUr0wH354
Trendlines
A thread on Trend-lines pic.twitter.com/GsLGzl8A3c
— Trader knight (@Traderknight007) January 2, 2021
Scaling in-out
A thread on SCALING IN - OUT METHOD - pic.twitter.com/bJ1N5ZjAiK
— Trader knight (@Traderknight007) January 9, 2021
You May Also Like
1/x Fort Detrick History
Mr. Patrick, one of the chief scientists at the Army Biological Warfare Laboratories at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., held five classified US patents for the process of weaponizing anthrax.
2/x
Under Mr. Patrick’s direction, scientists at Fort Detrick developed a tularemia agent that, if disseminated by airplane, could cause casualties & sickness over 1000s mi². In a 10,000 mi² range, it had 90% casualty rate & 50% fatality rate
3/x His team explored Q fever, plague, & Venezuelan equine encephalitis, testing more than 20 anthrax strains to discern most lethal variety. Fort Detrick scientists used aerosol spray systems inside fountain pens, walking sticks, light bulbs, & even in 1953 Mercury exhaust pipes
4/x After retiring in 1986, Mr. Patrick remained one of the world’s foremost specialists on biological warfare & was a consultant to the CIA, FBI, & US military. He debriefed Soviet defector Ken Alibek, the deputy chief of the Soviet biowarfare program
https://t.co/sHqSaTSqtB
5/x Back in Time
In 1949 the Army created a small team of chemists at "Camp Detrick" called Special Operations Division. Its assignment was to find military uses for toxic bacteria. The coercive use of toxins was a new field, which fascinated Allen Dulles, later head of the CIA
Mr. Patrick, one of the chief scientists at the Army Biological Warfare Laboratories at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., held five classified US patents for the process of weaponizing anthrax.
2/x
Under Mr. Patrick’s direction, scientists at Fort Detrick developed a tularemia agent that, if disseminated by airplane, could cause casualties & sickness over 1000s mi². In a 10,000 mi² range, it had 90% casualty rate & 50% fatality rate
3/x His team explored Q fever, plague, & Venezuelan equine encephalitis, testing more than 20 anthrax strains to discern most lethal variety. Fort Detrick scientists used aerosol spray systems inside fountain pens, walking sticks, light bulbs, & even in 1953 Mercury exhaust pipes
4/x After retiring in 1986, Mr. Patrick remained one of the world’s foremost specialists on biological warfare & was a consultant to the CIA, FBI, & US military. He debriefed Soviet defector Ken Alibek, the deputy chief of the Soviet biowarfare program
https://t.co/sHqSaTSqtB
5/x Back in Time
In 1949 the Army created a small team of chemists at "Camp Detrick" called Special Operations Division. Its assignment was to find military uses for toxic bacteria. The coercive use of toxins was a new field, which fascinated Allen Dulles, later head of the CIA
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.