#TITAN Many experts were giving 3k as target when stock price was near 2500 😀
~ Immediate resistance near 2175 level
Weekly ratio chart against #nifty says👇
~Oversold in near term, Bounce to banta hai
~But may underperform against #nifty in next 2-3 months.
More from Pranay Prasun
#ASIANPAINT Shared monthly chart for reference 👇
~ Gave sell call near 3300
~ Good to add at below levels
2580 /2200 https://t.co/lRdCEfw7WD
~ Gave sell call near 3300
~ Good to add at below levels
2580 /2200 https://t.co/lRdCEfw7WD
#ASIANPAINTS We all know about this stock but is it really worth to add at CMP?
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) February 19, 2022
Reasons are \U0001f447
~Monthly RSI is too high .So we may see breakdown in next few months
~Continuous profit booking at top level.Hence we're near to top in long term chart
Hope it helps u to understand\U0001f60a pic.twitter.com/3ltwZMs3d8
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
