w8FUyzySvo

#BlueDart sold all yesterday with 50%+ ROI & converted it in to #TCIEXP .....Rationale-: Below #Ratio #TCI / #BLUEDART is self explanatory\U0001f447 https://t.co/PNl9PWOB8V pic.twitter.com/ZTX86nLoDJ
— Akaash (@thepnfway) July 20, 2021

More from Akaash

Akaash
@thepnfway

#HDFC looking strong with nice Bullish C&H BO pattern......

Akaash
@thepnfway

#HBLPOWER...... amongst very few Scrips which are trying to make new ATH .................

Akaash
@thepnfway

#GARFIBRES this #holding is giving a a fresh Bullish continuation follow through today .....3600+ from 1400 already......#ADB https://t.co/9VFfasjFFU

#GARFIBRES 1400 to 3300....Going good with fantastic 135% absolute ROI .....Fresh new ATH today...#Holding https://t.co/vqckq1LJbm
— Akaash (@thepnfway) June 21, 2021

Akaash
@thepnfway

#15100 strikes OIs Bullish crossover.... https://t.co/IgXLn1P5F3

#15100 strikes OIs are still away, though 15100PE OI has risen sharply since morning but unable to cross above 15100CE OI.. any crossover intraday shall further fuel up the rally....otherwise Nifty may close below or around 15100 cash levels today. #JUSTaVIEW pic.twitter.com/6aQIPEFx3h
— Akaash (@thepnfway) May 21, 2021

Akaash
@thepnfway

#TATAMETALI .....bulls have upper hand......

According to psychologists, there are four types of intelligence:

- Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
- Emotional Quotient (EQ)
- Social Quotient (SQ)
- Adversity Quotient (AQ)

1. IQ is the measure of one's ability to comprehend, solve maths; memorize things & recall subject matters.

2. EQ is the measure of your ability to maintain peace with others; keep to time; be responsible; be honest; respect boundaries; be humble, genuine, and considerate.

3. SQ is the measure of one's ability to build a network of friends & maintain it over a long period of time.

4. AQ is the measure of your ability to go through a rough patch in life and come out without losing your mind. It is a new paradigm and can be used to determine who will give up in face of troubles and may abandon their families.

Now to the very interesting & analytical part👇

People that have higher EQ & SQ tend to go further in life than those with high IQ but low EQ &SQ.

Most schools capitalize on improving IQ level while EQ & SQ are played down.

A man of high IQ can end up being employed by a man of high EQ & SQ even though he has an average IQ.

Your EQ represents your character; your SQ represents your charisma. Give in to habits that will improve these three Qs but more especially your EQ and SQ.

EQ and SQ make one manage better than the other.

Try not only to have a higher IQ but also to have higher EQ and SQ.

Guillaume Chaslot
@gchaslot

The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.

Flat Earth conference attendees explain how they have been brainwashed by YouTube and Infowars https://t.co/gqZwGXPOoc
— Raw Story (@RawStory) November 18, 2018

This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/

A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/

https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/

https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/

Zena Hitz
@zenahitz

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x

As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021

The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x