#TATAELXSI-7993
Weekly chart.
Trend line breakdown witness on weekly chart. Same face #resistance at 8822.
#Exit_strategy cash on hand, even if you don't want.
Weekly closing below 7294 put all set for downside.
#Probability
More from Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) मैंSchedule Tribe)
More from Tataelxsilongterm
Time to update reading on #tataelxsi. Note where the last fall was supported. Perfectly near the previous arc BO level. We will make some retracements here & there but now seems to be going for 10391. 3rd arc formation in process & looks very similar to the previous one https://t.co/KwBFN6fkKk
This is line chart based arc I plotted a few days ago to see where does the target of 2nd arc completes. We got ~9200(+/- 100/-) Switch to candles. See rejection area. Arc on candles is not really ideal but on line it is. No view above 9200! MAs need to catch up. #TATAELXSI pic.twitter.com/WNJRZZedrj
— Ameya (@Finstor85) March 30, 2022
Reasons-
1. Long term channel top.
2. Curvature shift of 20 and 50 WMA along with price hitting 20 WMA frequently.
3. Overall weakness in IT sector.
4. For reference, study reliance top in August 2020, study Nasdaq Weekly chart and the top made in Nov 2021.
#tataelxi https://t.co/RmJa5LrdAP
1. Long term channel top.
2. Curvature shift of 20 and 50 WMA along with price hitting 20 WMA frequently.
3. Overall weakness in IT sector.
4. For reference, study reliance top in August 2020, study Nasdaq Weekly chart and the top made in Nov 2021.
#tataelxi https://t.co/RmJa5LrdAP
I have traded the current fav Tata Elxi from 2200 to 4500. No regret on missing out rest of the move because I am not an investor. Now there are many technical red flags. I might be trolled but 10.5k looks max target while 5k or 3-4 years of sideways looks inevitable.#tataelxi
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) March 26, 2022
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
