Materials I studied for hundreds of hours before I became consistently profitable as a day trader - a thread:
https://t.co/VrdX0GViIb
More from Ta
Moving Averages 📚
💎SECRET INFO inside
🧠Great for both beginners & advanced traders
▪️ What are they?
▪️ Types of MAs
▪️ Why are they such a powerful tool?
▪️ How to properly use them?
▪️ My best SECRET EMA value?
▪️ Which Timeframe to use?
▪️ Advanced EMA technique?
1/20
▪️ What are they?
Moving average is nothing more than an average price of the last (value) of candles.
If we are gonna use an example of MA(50) it is gonna be the mean price of the last 50 candles
General rule:
Price above = Bullish 🐂
Price below = Bearish 🐻
2/20
▪️ Types of Moving Averages
1) Simple Moving Average - SMA
2) Exponential Moving Average - EMA
3) Smoothed Moving Average - SMMA
4) Volume Weighted Average Price - VWAP
There are a few more but these are the most important in my opinion.
3/20
I won't be going that much into detail about each of them in this thread but more so covering MAs in general.
The important takeaway is there are many methods of calculations and each offers bit different pros & cons
I'll leave experimenting with each of them up to you
4/20
▪️ Why are they such a powerful tool?
Because they help everyone, even newbies, that are just starting out, to easily & visually clearly identify trends without understanding the advanced Market Structure techniques.
Price above = 🐂
5/20
https://t.co/g5SneLNPh5
💎SECRET INFO inside
🧠Great for both beginners & advanced traders
▪️ What are they?
▪️ Types of MAs
▪️ Why are they such a powerful tool?
▪️ How to properly use them?
▪️ My best SECRET EMA value?
▪️ Which Timeframe to use?
▪️ Advanced EMA technique?
1/20
▪️ What are they?
Moving average is nothing more than an average price of the last (value) of candles.
If we are gonna use an example of MA(50) it is gonna be the mean price of the last 50 candles
General rule:
Price above = Bullish 🐂
Price below = Bearish 🐻
2/20
▪️ Types of Moving Averages
1) Simple Moving Average - SMA
2) Exponential Moving Average - EMA
3) Smoothed Moving Average - SMMA
4) Volume Weighted Average Price - VWAP
There are a few more but these are the most important in my opinion.
3/20
I won't be going that much into detail about each of them in this thread but more so covering MAs in general.
The important takeaway is there are many methods of calculations and each offers bit different pros & cons
I'll leave experimenting with each of them up to you
4/20
▪️ Why are they such a powerful tool?
Because they help everyone, even newbies, that are just starting out, to easily & visually clearly identify trends without understanding the advanced Market Structure techniques.
Price above = 🐂
5/20
https://t.co/g5SneLNPh5
Market Structure (MS)
— J A C K I S (@jackis_trader) July 6, 2020
Understanding MS is the most important thing in TA
It rules above everything. TL's, MA's, Indicators. Everything.
While it's nothing more than looking at swings and seeing Higher Highs (HH), Highers Lows (HL), Lower Highs (LH), and Lower Lows (LL). pic.twitter.com/QbgOSHGkBr
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".