Jai 'Lord #NarsimhaPattern' for showing us the way 😊🙏

#Adaniports #ESCORTS #IOC were some of its recent spots
Latest occurrence getting confirmed #BHEL #BOSCH #CANBK #MGL & #BANKNIFTY ☺️
Watch out for these 🎁

More from Sacchitanand Uttekar

#CandleTrading Mega move
✅ #Candlesticks to spot reversal
+
☑️ #HeikinAshi to capture/ride the trend
Why ? Coz, Heikin dependence on previous candle data delays its signal.

Ideal combination for #Traders; By keeping both the time scales constant.
Do try it 🤗 https://t.co/VSv8lhkAAq

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?