I used to wear Wonder Woman Underoos as a kid. My mother would make me behave by telling me I wouldn't be able to watch the original Lynda Carter show. I was OBSESSED.

Which makes the current DCEU version of WW downright depressing for me.

/THREAD

The problem with Wonder Woman in the live action DCEU has similar roots to the problems with ALL the live action DCEU. There isn't a single person in charge who understands and LOVES these characters. So no singular vision. To whit:

https://t.co/o4NuuokBvw
Jenkins was correct to toss out Whedon's version of Diana. No way she sits on the sidelines while people suffer. That's not my Diana. My Diana would also not be an idiot over Chris Pine, but that's a different rant. This rant is about TERRIBLE WRITING.
Good writing has LAYERS. Go watch just about any Pixar film to learn about layering. Layers means that the action and dialog have one meaning for the characters and another meaning for the audience. An example from CAPTAIN MARVEL...
In CAPTAIN MARVEL, we have a badass woman who is kept under control by an evil dude who gaslights her about her power and potential. She is held back by a misogynist patriarchy that is downright terrified of what she'd be capable of if she was allowed to believe in herself.
The final fight in CAPTAIN MARVEL is cinematic genius. We are going to get the cliched ending where a badguy mouths off about his plans and motivations, and Marvel just decks the dude. It is commentary about mansplaining while satirizing cinema. Brilliant.
So the DCEU had a problem with Wonder Woman. She's been around a long time, but we haven't seen her yet. What to do? Lazy writer: SHE'S BEEN IN HIDING ON AN ISLAND. SHE'S EMO. SHE IS REALLY GOOD AT BEING STEALTHY.

Zero social commentary. Zero layers. Boring and dumb.
What they should have done is so damn obvious that it makes a writer cry. They should have shown that Diana was there all along in PLAIN SIGHT, saving the world's bacon over and over again, but we refused to see her contributions. You know, like history.
Like Rosalind Franklin, Ada Lovelace, Judith Rich Harris, Grace Hopper, Chien-Shiung Wu, and a thousand others.

Imagine the wow-factor of seeing classic DCEU shots, but this time we see that Diana was there the entire time, fighting alongside Batman and Superman.
She's standing there with Bruce outside the Joker's interrogation room. She's there with Superman fighting Lex.

We just didn't see her. We didn't give her any credit. But she was there all along.
At some point, a character asks her how she's stayed invisible so long. Is it her magic lasso? "No." Is it her invisible plane? She points to the plane, painted red, blue, and gold. "I made it as bright as I could, a symbol of hope."

Then how?

"You tell me," she says.
The reason she's been invisible is because she never asked for praise. She never stuck around for the press conference. There was ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSE TO SAVE.

I was raised by a single mom who worked three jobs to keep the lights on. She had no time for taking credit. #badass
So why is she suddenly visible in the 21st century? It's not anything magical she did. It's what women of our time started doing. They started seeing and BELIEVING. Pushing back. Told through vignettes like this:
A man boasting about how Superman saved the day. His little daughter corrects him. "Wonder Woman did that," she says. He hushes her, and we see a little scowl on her face.
A dinner date. Obvious first date. Man is bragging about being at a bank when Batman stopped a robbery. We see his bored date on her phone, liking a story shared by a friend on how Wonder Woman stopped the robbery. Batman showed up late. "Traffic," he said.
So when Wonder Woman is asked why she's been invisible, the answer is that it's taken us this long to see her. She's always been here, always kicking ass, never looking for credit. Like many of our moms. Like many women throughout history.

/END

More from Society

The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW
Patriotism is an interesting concept in that it’s excepted to mean something positive to all of us and certainly seen as a morally marketable trait that can fit into any definition you want for it.+


Tolstoy, found it both stupid and immoral. It is stupid because every patriot holds his own country to be the best, which obviously negates all other countries.+

It is immoral because it enjoins us to promote our country’s interests at the expense of all other countries, employing any means, including war. It is thus at odds with the most basic rule of morality, which tells us not to do to others what we would not want them to do to us+

My sincere belief is that patriotism of a personal nature, which does not impede on personal and physical liberties of any other, is not only welcome but perhaps somewhat needed.

But isn’t adherence to a more humane code of life much better than nationalistic patriotism?+

Göring said, “people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”+

You May Also Like

🌺श्री गरुड़ पुराण - संक्षिप्त वर्णन🌺

हिन्दु धर्म के 18 पुराणों में से एक गरुड़ पुराण का हिन्दु धर्म में बड़ा महत्व है। गरुड़ पुराण में मृत्यु के बाद सद्गती की व्याख्या मिलती है। इस पुराण के अधिष्ठातृ देव भगवान विष्णु हैं, इसलिए ये वैष्णव पुराण है।


गरुड़ पुराण के अनुसार हमारे कर्मों का फल हमें हमारे जीवन-काल में तो मिलता ही है परंतु मृत्यु के बाद भी अच्छे बुरे कार्यों का उनके अनुसार फल मिलता है। इस कारण इस पुराण में निहित ज्ञान को प्राप्त करने के लिए घर के किसी सदस्य की मृत्यु के बाद का समय निर्धारित किया गया है...

..ताकि उस समय हम जीवन-मरण से जुड़े सभी सत्य जान सकें और मृत्यु के कारण बिछडने वाले सदस्य का दुख कम हो सके।
गरुड़ पुराण में विष्णु की भक्ति व अवतारों का विस्तार से उसी प्रकार वर्णन मिलता है जिस प्रकार भगवत पुराण में।आरम्भ में मनु से सृष्टि की उत्पत्ति,ध्रुव चरित्र की कथा मिलती है।


तदुपरांत सुर्य व चंद्र ग्रहों के मंत्र, शिव-पार्वती मंत्र,इन्द्र सम्बंधित मंत्र,सरस्वती मंत्र और नौ शक्तियों के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया है।
इस पुराण में उन्नीस हज़ार श्लोक बताए जाते हैं और इसे दो भागों में कहा जाता है।
प्रथम भाग में विष्णुभक्ति और पूजा विधियों का उल्लेख है।

मृत्यु के उपरांत गरुड़ पुराण के श्रवण का प्रावधान है ।
पुराण के द्वितीय भाग में 'प्रेतकल्प' का विस्तार से वर्णन और नरकों में जीव के पड़ने का वृत्तांत मिलता है। मरने के बाद मनुष्य की क्या गति होती है, उसका किस प्रकार की योनियों में जन्म होता है, प्रेत योनि से मुक्ति के उपाय...
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.