Do not check 200 MA on the weekly chart.

200 MA on the weekly chart is 1000 days MA and not 200 days.

To see 200 days MA on a weekly scale - use 40 MA as 1 week has 5 trading days and therefore, 40 MA on a weekly scale is 200 days MA.

A common mistake

More from The_Chartist 📈

More from Screeners

Central Pivot Range—(CPR)

What does it mean?

7 tweets that will teach you about its basics (and much more):🧵

Collaborated with @niki_poojary

1/ What is CPR?

The basics of CPR, how it's calculated, and TC and BC in CPR.

User: @ZerodhaVarsity.

One can also gauge the trend whether bullish or bearish.

Explained in very simple words

@ZerodhaVarsity 2/ What are the Uses of CPR?

User: @YMehta_

A thread that provides examples along with the concept.

Also includes an Intraday Trading Setup on 5 min


@ZerodhaVarsity @YMehta_ 3/ How to analyze trends with CPR?

User: @cprbykgs

How to interpret CPR based on the candles forming either above or below the daily and weekly CPR.

He is the most famous guy when it comes to CPR, so go through his Twitter and Youtube


@ZerodhaVarsity @YMehta_ @cprbykgs 4/ Interpreting longer timeframes with CPR

User: @cprbykgs

Trend Reversals with CPR when the trend is bullish and it enters the daily CPR

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x