More from Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Blue line(13Sma)moves below Red line(26Sma), SELL triggers
Only 2 signals - Buy & Sell
There is no stop loss in this system.
There could be some wild swings in prices like on "Budget Day" - In such a scenario, Keep 30 - 50 points below 21Sma to avoid big DD
It's a SAR system
Only 2 signals - Buy & Sell
There is no stop loss in this system.
There could be some wild swings in prices like on "Budget Day" - In such a scenario, Keep 30 - 50 points below 21Sma to avoid big DD
It's a SAR system
how to take stop loss..? low of prev candle?
— ABHINAV JAIN (@abhijain017) February 9, 2022
@ap_pune had given a list of high liquid stocks for options trading & #auropharma was the 1st one.
Remembered it & made entry @ open for the "High rewarding 3rd wave"
Much appreciation🙏 to @ap_pune for his regular sharing of vital info. & wisdom from years of experience.
Remembered it & made entry @ open for the "High rewarding 3rd wave"
Much appreciation🙏 to @ap_pune for his regular sharing of vital info. & wisdom from years of experience.
#auropharma "Hour t/f" for "Traders"
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) March 21, 2022
In search of the highly rewarding 2nd wave entry.
Today's & tomorrow's #priceaction would have more clarity for entry either @ 615-620 or above 655 https://t.co/20S0Lvc7ej pic.twitter.com/OFlf9MLkqz
More from Screeners
Still having the same view. Will update if there is any change. Falling trendline breakout doesn't work that way in a bear market the way it works in a bull market. Updating your methods according to the market is the key.
#nifty50 https://t.co/64ZktWHQev
#nifty50 https://t.co/64ZktWHQev
This is the maximum upside for now, post that I am looking for an 8-9% fall in index.#nifty50 pic.twitter.com/BcSOiwWuBs
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) June 24, 2022
You May Also Like
Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"
The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.
1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!
2) "Repressed memory" syndrome
3) Facilitated Communication [FC]
All 3 led to massive abuse.
"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.
Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.
FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.
For three years I have wanted to write an article on moral panics. I have collected anecdotes and similarities between today\u2019s moral panic and those of the past - particularly the Satanic Panic of the 80s.
— Ashe Schow (@AsheSchow) September 29, 2018
This is my finished product: https://t.co/otcM1uuUDk
The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.
1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!
2) "Repressed memory" syndrome
3) Facilitated Communication [FC]
All 3 led to massive abuse.
"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.
Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.
FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
