10 week EMA is more logically powerful than a 10 day EMA. The reason being in weekly TF, 10EMA represents 50EMA in daily while 10 day EMA corresponds to much less important 50EMA in 75 min TF.
In the same way 40 week EMA is proxy to all important 200EMA in daily.
More from Aneesh Philomina Antony (ProdigalTrader)
Few concepts upon which day trading systems can be built upon
https://t.co/3eAoEqM7QQ up trending market look for pin bar with good volume
2.Rsi divergence and macd histogram divergence both at the same time on 3 min chart
https://t.co/qrAH9PZ6D3 = Low (15min)
1/7
4.ORB with 15 min candle stick along with support and resistance of previous 5 days
5.Pullbacks in Strong momentum (wide range candles + Volume) stocks
6.ORB with volatility contraction and then wide range candle breakout with volume expansion
2/7
7.Fakeout like spring and Upthrust for entry pullback with low volume
8.CPR analysis with standard pivots
9.PDH/PDL breakout with volume, vwap and RSI confirmation
3/7
10.Horizontal support/resistance from HTF and confirmation of acceptance or rejection in lower timeframe as reversal candlestick patterns with volume confirmation
https://t.co/75kykbExlg writing data and Put Writing data in correlation with price action
4/7
12.Pivots (Fibonacci) and Price action with volume activity
13.Ichimoku set ups with previous day NR4/NR7 scrips with pivots and volume as trading tools
https://t.co/JcwqOZS5L4 and rejections on 100/200 ema
15.EMA20 and rsi divergence with daily trend structure
5/7
https://t.co/3eAoEqM7QQ up trending market look for pin bar with good volume
2.Rsi divergence and macd histogram divergence both at the same time on 3 min chart
https://t.co/qrAH9PZ6D3 = Low (15min)
1/7
4.ORB with 15 min candle stick along with support and resistance of previous 5 days
5.Pullbacks in Strong momentum (wide range candles + Volume) stocks
6.ORB with volatility contraction and then wide range candle breakout with volume expansion
2/7
7.Fakeout like spring and Upthrust for entry pullback with low volume
8.CPR analysis with standard pivots
9.PDH/PDL breakout with volume, vwap and RSI confirmation
3/7
10.Horizontal support/resistance from HTF and confirmation of acceptance or rejection in lower timeframe as reversal candlestick patterns with volume confirmation
https://t.co/75kykbExlg writing data and Put Writing data in correlation with price action
4/7
12.Pivots (Fibonacci) and Price action with volume activity
13.Ichimoku set ups with previous day NR4/NR7 scrips with pivots and volume as trading tools
https://t.co/JcwqOZS5L4 and rejections on 100/200 ema
15.EMA20 and rsi divergence with daily trend structure
5/7
More from Screeners
Oil, copper and other commodities came under heavy selling pressure today and that's a good thing because it's mounting evidence that inflation may be peaking.
Positive signs on inflation include fertilizer prices peaking and trending downward. Used Car prices are also down (which led inflation). The recent price break on the $XLE - which emerged almost to the day the market topped, could be an indication that we are close to a low. pic.twitter.com/2MtcKjjmAz
— Mark Minervini (@markminervini) June 23, 2022
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x