Looks excellent. Reversal from primary trendline as well
#FnOstock #SBIN has completed a 9 month time correction towards the primary trend line & is all set to head higher from here.
— Trendline Investor (@dmdsplyinvestor) July 11, 2022
This could also be a #SIP stock considering it broke out from a decade long consolidation in Feb'21.
Might continue to outperform #Nifty & #Banknifty pic.twitter.com/mYk4exvOn7
More from Trendline Investor
Moving up slowly yet steadily 🐢without catching too many 👀!
Once 1000 is conquered, we might see some good moves here!
#stockideas https://t.co/1kwt7rR5qM
#Creditacc has managed to close above the horizontal resistance as well this week after the trendline breakout.
— Trendline Investor (@dmdsplyinvestor) April 2, 2022
Heading to clear skies soon!#stockideas #trendlines https://t.co/LpHXcbZAwN pic.twitter.com/XJ5721XIh5
Which one would be the next?
#StocksToBuy https://t.co/zaAfCtOkJ6
I think it is just about time for #broking stocks to \U0001f680!
— Trendline Investor (@dmdsplyinvestor) April 4, 2022
- #AngelOne looks the strongest & near ATH
- #Isec near major trendline support, forming Dojis on weekly
- #Motilalofs near major trendline supports, forming Dojis on monthly
All three low-risk setups!#stockideas pic.twitter.com/xB3Tm9jSou
More from Sbin
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?