Inspired by @michellearning I will be sharing 10 robotics papers that I really enjoyed reading (made me think and raised my heart rate) when I was a grad student. One paper per day. Starting tonight, ending on xmas day. Here we go: 👇🤖 1/n

Note: this is not necessarily an exhaustive list of the best or most influential papers in robotics, nor is it a list of my current favorite papers. These are papers that I found compelling and I still enjoy re-reading from time to time. The order is random. 2/n
[Paper #1] LQR-Trees by Russ Tedrake https://t.co/nYDaHYJryk. I love this paper. It's about feedback control and motion planning with probabilistic guarantees. Given a desired goal state, sample an initial state and find a nominal trajectory from the initial state to the goal 3/n
using LQR control (linear dynamics, quadratic cost). So far, so good. Then it gets interesting: it sets out to explicitly compute the region of stability of the computed controller without doing sampling. It underestimates this region by trying to compute a Lyapunov function 4/n
that will certify stability in the region. It only considers Lyapunov functions that are polynomials of deg N and optimizes for a positive function using sums-of-squares programming. So, now you have a nominal trajectory to the goal and a region of stability around it. 5/n
Repeat this process backwards by setting the new goal to be in the computed region of stability, and you have a region of stability that grows over time and (a) covers space, (b) can lead to complex global behaviors from simple linear controllers that are locally valid, 6/n
and (c) is one way to address compositionality in control. So, does all of this work in practice? Yes, with a few asterisks: the major bottleneck is solving the sum-of-squares program that computes the region of stability. It has been shown to be practical for low-dim systems 7/n
This paper, published in ~2010, was influenced by Pablo Parrilo's PhD thesis on semidef programming (2000), as well as older ideas about funnels from Matt Mason https://t.co/4MxHCJQy7l (1985) Rob Burridge, Alfred Rizzi, and Dan Koditschek https://t.co/LjNnY0ItD3 (1999) 8/n
Some of the limitations of the LQR Trees paper were addressed by @Majumdar_Ani in his PhD thesis https://t.co/m5jcbmZ3x5 I encourage you to read it and check out his other papers https://t.co/vso7qQchGp 9/n

You May Also Like

Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to


Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.

Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.

Mueller's team was 100% partisan.

That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election

They looked high.

They looked low.

They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.

And they found...NOTHING.

Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.

What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?

THERE WEREN'T ANY.

Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.