Chang'e-5 press conference happening

A few things from the CE-5 presser: Wu Yanhua: China will be sharing samples with scientists from other countries. methods for the management to be issued. As with US, Russia, the samples to be shared with institutions including the United Nations.
Later, asked if samples will be shared with NASA, Wu says: "First, in accordance with the Outer Space Treaty, outer space resources are the common asset of humanity. We will act upon the relevant treaties." -- this sounds like a shot at the Artemis Accords.
"Second, Chinese govt is ready to share samples inc data with all like-minded institutions from other countries. It has been unfortunate however after a Congressional act adopted in 2011 US space institutions have been blocked from cooperating with China, which is the Wolf Act."
"On the basis of equality, mutual benefit and win-win cooperation we are willing to conduct sincere and friendly cooperation with US institutions." -- you could interpret this as an open door or shot at US stance towards China.
Other topics: Human spaceflight: Wu says the first module of the Chinese Space Station will be launched early next year (this is expected). 11 missions over the next 2 years or so, inc. module, crew, and cargo launches.
China and Italy have an agreement on a second CSES (China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite) Chinese–Italian satellite to monitor seismic activity, even lead to better earthquake predicition.
Wu reiterates plans for Chang'e-6, 7, 8, and international lunar research base, including cooperation with relevant countries. Planetary missions planned are Near Earth Asteroid sample-return, Mars sample-return, Jupiter system explorer.
"For future lunar exploration tasks we are carrying out assessments... Space bases and space stations...The lunar sample return can be seen as a foundation on which we can do more. This opens up opportunities for our future work."
Xu Hongliang on lunar samples: Formulated the methods for the management of the samples and data. We will work with other govt depts in China and release plans for public solicitation and later release plans.
CCTV: Crewed missions to the moon in the future?
Wu: The people and media care about this a lot. The Chinese government always delivers a determined blueprint. We have already achieved plans from 16 years ago for the Moon and approaching the goals for Chinese Space Station.
Re: Moon? Currently working on breakthroughs in key technologies. If we can achieve this, make good use of the space station, we will consider crewed Moon missions. And if we do, goal of Chinese government will be different from that of what the US & USSR wanted...
...They were competing in a ‘Star Wars’; we want to conduct scientific research and benefit humanity. We want to know more about the ecological and environmental data of the Moon.
Concluding, Wu says: Many countries have the capabilities for lunar and deep space exploration. There is so much we don’t understand about the universe. So far we only know the tip of the iceberg. So for major countries they are duty-bound to conduct deep space exploration...
...where they can. For China, this is what we are doing. We are conducting exploration as a contribution to the welfare of humanity.

For lunar exploration we have already completed the three steps. Going forward, focus will be 3 parts. Exploration, construction and utilization.
Exploration is studying the environment of the moon in various categories. Construction, we are planning to build certain infrastructure on the moon including satellites to provide a basis for long-term studies and the production of power. Utilization, we need to be able to...
utilize the resources on the moon and the data we have collected. Whether we can conduct crewed travel to the moon, it can work technologically but the cost would be huge. So my view is that the lunar programs will focus on science first and foremost.

You May Also Like

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel was previously CEO of bioMerieux in France from 07-10.

Alain Merieux, who owns bioMerieux, was instrumental in the creation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology P4 Lab.

The same people who helped create the virus, also helped to create the vaccines...


Moderna partnered with French Pasteur Institute in 2015 to develop mRNA vaccine technology.

Pasteur Institute partnered with the Wuhan P4 Laboratory in 2017 along with the Merieux Foundation to study emerging viruses...
https://t.co/yFsHwrNYaK
https://t.co/9M5lydBKhM


Nobel prize winning scientist Luc Montagnier asserts that Sars-Cov-2 is man-made and originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Montagnier did extensive work with the Pasteur Institute in France which was partnered with the Wuhan P4.

Merieux Foundation & the Chinese government have worked together since 1965, and partnered to study emerging pathogens in Africa in 2015.

Their research included "PATHOGENS CARRIED BY BATS" that provoke respiratory diseases.

🚨🚨🚨
https://t.co/gVwpT0ssqI
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.