The Grifter - In 9 Tweets

1)

Frontpage lawsuit by a Jane Doe in April 2016 against Candidate Trump, during the run-up to the Presidential

2)

After the headlines did their damage, the case was suddenly dropped.

https://t.co/hEXMtDBzN4
3)

Politico confirmed in #2 above that the Jane Doe lawsuit in April 2016 ahead of the 2016 Presidential Election, was in fact Virginia Giuffre
4)

Yet in 2016 Giuffre sued the President anyway, nearly costing him the election. Certainly impacting it.
5)

Giuffre started trying to take/shake down President Trump in 2016, went quiet for 4 years, and now she's back again in 2020?

Why 4 years of silence then strike again now?
6)

Here's the photo from #5 above

Problem is, the Trump kids look max ten or twelve in this image, they are the same age as Virginia.

So this photo was taken around 1990, years before Virginia was abused by Epstein. Looks like it was taken at a club party.
7)

Problem is.....

Scumbag Epstein wasn't outed until 2005, approximately 15 years after this photo.
8)

I'm sure Virginia didn't know about Epstein's terrible crimes when she met him at 15 (or 16 as Dershowitz claims).

So how can she now claim she knows with such conviction, that President Trump knew sicko Epstein's secret?
9)

I found it interesting VG went after Alan Dershowitz who had all the free legal resources and money to bury her, but didn't go after the President again.

I didn't know about the settlement until tonight, in part why I wrote this.

I ain't saying she's a gold digger..

/end

More from Politics

This is partly what makes it impossible to have a constructive conversation nowadays. The stubborn refusal to accept that opposition to Trumpism and GOP nationalism is about more than simply holding different beliefs about things in and of itself. 👇


It's fine for people to hold different beliefs. But that doesn't mean all beliefs deserve equal treatment or tolerance and it doesn't mean intolerance of some beliefs makes a person intolerant of every belief which they don't share.

So if I said I don't think Trumpism deserves to be tolerated because it's just a fresh 21st century coat of cheap paint on a failed, dangerous 20th century ideology (fascism) that doesn't mean I'm intolerant of all beliefs with which I disagree. You'd think this would be obvious.

Another important facet. People who support fascist movements tend to give what they think are valid reasons for supporting them. That doesn't mean anyone is obliged to tolerate fascism or accept their proffered excuse.


Say you joined a neighborhood group that sets up community gardens and does roadside beautification projects. All good, right? Say one day you're having a meeting and you notice the President and exec board of this group are saying some bizarre things about certain neighbors.

You May Also Like