In 2011, inspired by the Arab Spring, thousands of union members occupied the Wisconsin state capitol - shutting down the legislature in an effort to stop anti-union legislation. Months later, the Occupy movement exploded. A thread on how this relates to #DC + why it matters.

Mass demonstrations of upwards of 100,000 union members, community groups, and their supporters broke out in early 2011 against the Wisconsin Act 10, which attacked collective bargaining, health care and pensions. By February 20th, a physical occupation of the capitol began.
"In Wisconsin, public sector workers, students, and others more generally occupied the Capitol building to stop it from functioning. They prevented the legislative process, the transition from paper, to voting quorum, to the laws taking effect, and thus manifested a force..."
In early March, after being locked out of the capitol, union protesters re-occupied the building while chanting "general strike!"
Inside the occupied capitol, assemblies were held and food was shared communally. On the outside, strikes were called and solidarity occupations broke out at universities. Talk of a general strike filled the air.
Funded by billionaires like the Koch Brothers, anti-union and conservative groups also mobilized to oppose the protests, with the Tea Party playing a key role in organizing the Right. https://t.co/huJ0rsAWYP
Democrats in a limited role, simply stopped reporting to work at the capitol, thus blocking the amount needed for the legislature to meet quorum in order to vote.
In the end, the Democratic party and union leadership was able to muzzle the self-organized aspects of the struggle and pacified a growing push for a general strike into a campaign for what became an unsuccessful recall attempt. https://t.co/QLCHV1hGSJ
Fast forward to today, and the entire political class is attempting to paint the failed fascist coup by Trump supporters in terms of a "few extremists." Recent polls show nearly half of Trump supporters approve of the coup. https://t.co/uvaTS3idW5
For Democrats attempting to create a new ruling majority around the Center, their goal is to lay the ground work for broad + sweeping repression against popular social movements across the board, especially those from below addressing systematic racism + wealth inequality.
In short, we need to be clear that we oppose the attempted fascist coup because we oppose fascism itself. Our lives would not be made better if a growing fascist current installed Donald Trump a dictator for life. Such an act would make our lives worse - not better.
But we should also be clear that up until this point, Trump has marshaled the entire American state to further entrench class + racial apartheid - from the exploding COVID-19 death toll to forced sterilizations of migrant detention detainees - to which the DNC has done nothing.
The point being, if we allow ourselves to let politicians define what forms of protest and resistance are legitimate, then we quickly will be finding ourselves with less and less tools to better our lives and conditions.
Remember: it was the Democratic Party which clamped down and smashed the Occupy encampments, flooded the streets of Ferguson with tanks, and sent in the military to Standing Rock.
And since the last time Biden was in office, the Security State as only grown and focused itself more and more of its energy against movements like Black Lives Matter. https://t.co/9x6SU5f99G
Centrists + liberals will ask: how could the coup in DC happen. In part, it was the build up of state repression that was created during the Obama years that focused on anarchists, Black Lives Matter and Occupy - while ignoring the far-Right. https://t.co/ZKVq7Zlvr5
As we enter the post-Trump world, let's work to oppose fascism + white supremacists, but also recognize that state repression - even carried out under the guise of 'anti-fascism' - will always come down harder against anti-capitalist and anti-colonial movements from below.

More from Politics

THREAD:
Good afternoon, followers of frivolous election litigation. There's a last-minute entry in the competition for dumbest pre-inauguration lawsuit - a totally loony effort to apparently leave the entire USA without a government.

We'll start with the complaint in a minute.

But first, I want to give you a quick explanation for why I'm going to keep talking about these cases even after the inauguration.

They're part of an ongoing effort - one that's not well-coordinated but is widespread - to discredit our fundamental system of government.

It's a direct descendent, in more ways than one, of birtherism. And here's the thing about birtherism. It might have been a joke to a lot of people, but it was extremely pernicious. It obviously validated the racist "not good enough to be President" crowd. But that wasn't all.

Don't get me wrong, that was bad enough. Validating racism helped put the kind of shitbird who would tweet this from an official government account into power. But it didn't stop


(Also, if you agree with Pompeo about multiculturalism - the legendary melting pot - not being what this country is all about, you need to stop following me now. And maybe go somewhere and think about your life choices and what made you such a tool.)
Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".