#SolarWinds hack. Thread.
1. Dominion Voting Systems, a voting machine vendor used in #Election2020, is a Solar Winds client. It does not use Orion, the product at the center of the hack. via attorney Paul Lehto

Solar Winds list of clients is now hidden

2. Unknown if #hacking investigation is expanding to all #SolarWinds clients, like Dominion Voting Systems.
#ElectionSecurity #ElectionProtection #Election2020results
3. "early signs indicate the reach of the stealthy supplychain attack will have substantial aftershocks; #SolarWinds claims to have 300,000 customers, inc. /National Security Agency all 5 branches of the U.S. military & entities in /health tech telecommunications media & finance"
4. We discuss the #SolarWinds breach in our #ElectionProtection forum on Tuesday with Election & Cyber expert @rad_atl

https://t.co/jj0zK2i2gJ (46 mins in)
5. Department of Homeland Security is one of the hacked agencies. CISA (a DHS sub-agency) assured the public that “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history." Meanwhile DHS may have been compromised itself for as much as 9 months. https://t.co/dU6ViAI4h1
6. "hackers responsible for the infiltration of SolarWinds are some of the most capable hackers FireEye says it has ever observed/but it’s alarming that the U.S. government’s / intel & natl security apparatus was not alert to the espionage operation" https://t.co/R3Z1U5zwaW
7. The hack was not 1st reported by US intel, but by a private company FireEye, a private security firm that found it had been hacked itself. https://t.co/PaZ0r5tT4K

#ElectionSecurity #ElectionProtection #Election2020results #SMARTelections
8. "hackers, had penetrated FireEye's servers and made off with its crown jewels: the tools it uses to test other companies’ defenses. Armed with those penetration tools, hackers could potentially identify which of their methods will pass FireEye's gaze undetected." #Election2020
9. Much of the penetration was done by compromising official software downloads "US government networks were compromised: by installing tainted downloads – " This can also be done with voting machines as well - because they have to be updated for each election. #ElectionIntegrity
10. So the argument that is commonly used that voting machines are secure because they are not connected to the internet is false. It's good to keep voting systems offline - but election best practices must take into account that almost any system can eventually be hacked.
11. That is why meticulous, thorough post-election auditing of ballots that are hand-marked by voters whenever possible is so important - because that is how security experts recommend a system can be checked for accuracy to verify no hacking or mistakes have occurred. #Elections
12. Touchscreen ballot-marking devices like Dominion ICX (Georgia) and ExpressVote XL (Philly & NY - pending cert) are NOT good to use as a primary voting system. Because the computer creates the ballot, there's no way to use an audit of ballots to check for #hacking & errors.

More from Politics

My piece in the NY Times today: "the Trump administration is denying applications submitted to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services at a rate 37 percent higher than the Obama administration did in 2016."

Based on this analysis: "Denials for immigration benefits—travel documents, work permits, green cards, worker petitions, etc.—increased 37 percent since FY 2016. On an absolute basis, FY 2018 will see more than about 155,000 more denials than FY 2016."
https://t.co/Bl0naOO0sh


"This increase in denials cannot be credited to an overall rise in applications. In fact, the total number of applications so far this year is 2 percent lower than in 2016. It could be that the higher denial rate is also discouraging some people from applying at all.."

Thanks to @gsiskind for his insightful comments. The increase in denials, he said, is “significant enough to make one think that Congress must have passed legislation changing the requirements. But we know they have not.”

My conclusion:

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?