Through a law lobbied by the SGPC & #AkaliDal the @narendramodi government had disenfranchised the relatively liberal Sahajdhari Sikhs who consist mostly of Vaishya - Arora Sikhs in 2016 giving Akalis full control over the Gurudwaras, & giving rise to TRUE sikh narrative. https://t.co/WJaZjdqJDN

Udasis the monastic wing of Sikhism that was started by Guru Nanak's son Sri Chand was expelled from Gurudwaras, their murtis thrown out & declared non sikh along with Nanakpanthis & several other Sikh sects that were close to Hinduism.
If Khalistan terrorism was not anti-Hindu should explain why one after the other each & every sect in Sikhism that is similar to Hinduism was thrown out since Akali movement of 1925? Sehajdharis are latest, in 2016 to be disenfranchised.
https://t.co/V8zNpx7DDT
Why were the the 1984 riots always mentioned by leaders across political spectrum, leaders in India & abroad. But have you ever heard anyone talk about those hindus who were killed by Khalistanis?
https://t.co/lLvux0Esz8
One of the most ancient sects of Sikhs founded by Guru Nanak's son Sri Chand the Udasis, enjoyed state patronage & support under the sikh Empire of Ranjith Singh. How did they go from there to not even being sikhs in a matter of a few decades?
https://t.co/H7sYSUeBiS
Their various sub-sects were started by ascetic sons of various Sikh Gurus like Guru Hargobind. The only reason for excommunication & disenfranchisement of sects like Udasis, Nanakpanthis etc to latest sehajdharis is to burndown any & every connection with Hindus.
It is this Akali movement that spread hatred for anything hindu, even their own ascetics, intepreters & brothers for Hindu connection that manifested into separatism. Akali dal fuelled it with Anandpur Sahib resolution. Congress used Bhindranwale
https://t.co/SLlwM5xrCV
BJP leaders including Modi also committed mistakes by giving into SAD demands in latest excommunication of the Sahajdharis & "Patitas" in 2016. But none of them can be accused of starting it. That was done by Akalis on 1925.
With Pakistan ISI support, funding & Indira's approval they just turned into a full fledged terrorist group. But the philosophy of separatism and hatred came from the Akali movement only. Denying that & blaming Congress is like blaming the US for Al Queida & Jihad.
The claim that Khalistan was not Sikh akali terrorism against hindus because it killed many sikhs falls flat because Islamic state & Taliban killed many muslims. By the same stupid logic one could say Congress is innocent because Khalistanis killed IG, Beant Singh & many Congis.
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Politics

I told you they’d bring this up


I was wondering why that tweet had so many stupid replies. And now I see


Seriously, this was “the night before.” If you’re at the march where they’re changing “Jews will not replace us” and “Blood and soil,” you’re not a “very fine person.” Full stop.


There are 3 important moments in that transcript.

1.) When someone asked Trump about a statement *he had already made* about there being blame on “both sides,” he said the “fine people” line.


2. Trump does clarify! “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally “

Okay!

Then adds that there were “many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.”
How the CIA gets the media to lie to you

https://t.co/vsTrS43Fft


https://t.co/rUTYg42PYH


https://t.co/1r0MbPv8wG


War on democracy - installing US-puppet dictators in Latin America in order to control their economies
#Guatemala #Arbenz #RedScare

Propaganda, "harmless bombing" and a CIA terror campaign


CIA war on Nicaragua

You May Also Like

I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.