“The chances that you could ever see 123,000 votes in a row for the same person are – you could go pick a grain of sand on a beach and I could go pick a grain of sand on another beach and the chances that we picked the same grain is as close to you can get to zero.
Continued thread 3
1/21
“The chances that you would have 1,000 votes in a row would be something like 2 quadrillion-to-1 against.
“The chances that you could ever see 123,000 votes in a row for the same person are – you could go pick a grain of sand on a beach and I could go pick a grain of sand on another beach and the chances that we picked the same grain is as close to you can get to zero.
So, the point is that these three things line up: Bucket #1. The technical capabilities of the machines; Bucket #2. The lived experience of the people who went & voted in these districts &; Bucket #3. The statistical results – all dovetail together & tell this ironclad story
“You’ve gotta prove ‘Could it happen?’ and ‘Did it happen?’ The question of ‘Could it happen?’ is addressed by Bucket #1, that the machines have this functionality. The question of ‘Did it happen?’ is proven by Buckets #2 and #3, the lived experience of the people who lived
and voted in these precincts and the statistical outcomes all prove it did happen.
“So, together, all that information fits hand-in-glove, perfectly.”
Regarding the piles of blank ballots reported shipped in, Byrne says, “We have hundreds of affadavits of people who saw different glimpses of different things and when you put all those affadavits together, that’s exactly what you get.
- NO WIDESPREAD FRAUD IS TRUE – IT WAS NARROW AND DEEP -
“Here’s the big thing, it’s gonna make you puke – the Democrats are right about something – so, I’m not a Republican, but I’m REALLY not a Democrat.
“Democrats who’ve been saying, ‘There was no evidence of widespread fraud’ are missing the point. But they’re right, it wasn’t that it was widespread – it was narrow and deep – and the Bad Guys picked six places to do it.
“What they realized, was that if you cheated like crazy in 6 counties in America, you could flip the states that they’re in and hence, flip the Electoral College and hence, steal the Nation, by flipping 6 counties.
& those are Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Detroit, Maricopa & Clark County, in Nevada. “Those 6 counties – & the first 4 of them are heavily Black & I believe they did that, because I think the goons on the Left have been using the Black community for my entire lifetime
“It isn’t that the Black people cheated. The people who cheated were the people running the systems and maybe people over in China and other places did the cheating. The Black people just did the voting.
They did that, so when all this gets exposed, they’re gonna say, ‘Oh! You’re trying to suppress the Black Vote!’ “Well, I will have nothing to do with any racial element. I’m a huge anti-racist…
what they’re going to try to do, as they always do, is to hide behind Black people…The Bad Guys cheated the Hell out of these 4 predominantly Black cities and then Maricopa, Phoenix, which is Hispanic.”
- THE PATH TO VICTORY -
Byrne says he’s had enough evidence to win these cases for over 17 days. Now, it’s just a matter of explaining the details to the lawyers to whom he’s made his information available, as a concerned citizen,
who’s paying his own way and who is neither working for the Trump Campaign nor for Sidney Powell. “There’s no honest judge in America who wouldn’t get it. It’s open-and-shut. The only question, at this point is the whole legal process –
and the Bad Guys are trying to pour cement over this whole election and bury it before any of this stuff gets out. But it’s open-and-shut that this happened on a massive scale.”
He says blockchain cryptography cold solve all of this, where we would no longer rely on these Government employees who can be – and who are – bought.
“The Goldman-Sachs of the world can buy themselves regulators and senators and congressmen and journalists and maybe judges but there’s one thing that even Goldman-Sachs can’t buy and that’s the laws of mathematics.
So, the more that we base on the laws of mathematics, which is to say cryptography, which is to say blockchain, the more we solve this problem of corruption…
More from Politics
Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.
This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."
There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?
It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."
The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.
Funny there are those who think these migrant caravans were a FANTASTIC idea that's going to take the immigration issue away from you.
— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) November 26, 2018
Like several weeks watching a rampaging horde storm the fences & throw rocks at our border patrol agents & getting gassed = great optics!
This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."
There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?
It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."
The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
