(1/6) I've been reading through the account of @LeftwingGc & their opinion that American radfems need to reject groups like WoLF which ally with right-wing organizations. I understand their concern that it could lead to us winning single-sex spaces and losing women's rights. ➡️

(2/6) I'm a lifelong liberal Democrat. I want to believe those who say that American feminists don't need alliances with the right, but the evidence so far doesn't support it.

We are losing on every front. Every court case that transactivists bring takes another chunk out➡️
(3/6) of women's sex-based protections & girls' futures.

With the ACLU on their side and the Democrats having gone so far left that they've traveled up the other side of the ideological horseshoe w/o realizing it, we're as outgunned as a kid waving a water pistol at a tank.➡️
(4/6) If there's a plan to get back what we've lost and reverse the tide while holding fast to our leftwing status, I want to hear it. But I haven't.

And what I do hear sounds awfully familiar: I've seen most of it over the last couple of years from certain British academic➡️
(5/6) feminists - women who have, not entirely without cause, been accused of snobbery and purity politics by many of the people who worked to bring about the recent string of UK successes against gender extremism.

Radical feminists in the US are a scattered group, dwindling➡️
(6/6) both in number & influence. We are vilified & rejected everywhere from college campuses to Hollywood writers' rooms.

Show me how continuing to stand alone will result in a better outcome than we have seen thus far, or I must support single-issue alliances with the right. /

More from Politics

I told you they’d bring this up


I was wondering why that tweet had so many stupid replies. And now I see


Seriously, this was “the night before.” If you’re at the march where they’re changing “Jews will not replace us” and “Blood and soil,” you’re not a “very fine person.” Full stop.


There are 3 important moments in that transcript.

1.) When someone asked Trump about a statement *he had already made* about there being blame on “both sides,” he said the “fine people” line.


2. Trump does clarify! “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally “

Okay!

Then adds that there were “many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.”

You May Also Like

Trending news of The Rock's daughter Simone Johnson's announcing her new Stage Name is breaking our Versus tool because "Wrestling Name" isn't in our database!

Here's the most useful #Factualist comparison pages #Thread 🧵


What is the difference between “pseudonym” and “stage name?”

Pseudonym means “a fictitious name (more literally, a false name), as those used by writers and movie stars,” while stage name is “the pseudonym of an entertainer.”

https://t.co/hT5XPkTepy #english #wiki #wikidiff

People also found this comparison helpful:

Alias #versus Stage Name: What’s the difference?

Alias means “another name; an assumed name,” while stage name means “the pseudonym of an entertainer.”

https://t.co/Kf7uVKekMd #Etymology #words

Another common #question:

What is the difference between “alias” and “pseudonym?”

As nouns alias means “another name; an assumed name,” while pseudonym means “a fictitious name (more literally, a false name), as those used by writers and movie

Here is a very basic #comparison: "Name versus Stage Name"

As #nouns, the difference is that name means “any nounal word or phrase which indicates a particular person, place, class, or thing,” but stage name means “the pseudonym of an