Podcasts are free education.

But 99.99% of us don't know who to listen to

Here are 12 Podcasts that will make you think like the top 0.01%

https://t.co/6sT0qWLfvF
https://t.co/2ZwsvUFj1F
https://t.co/v0Wq2KL6hL
https://t.co/YhRj6VjirN
https://t.co/FBJFmbXyBN
https://t.co/YB5AtSfB4X
Study mathematics to understand physics

Study physics to understand chemistry

Study chemistry to understand biology

Study biology to understand psychology

Study psychology to understand economics

Study economics and philosophy to be free

Buy Now 👇
https://t.co/hQfa1m3MYp
If you enjoyed this thread, please:

1. Follow me (@Art0fWork) for more

2. Retweet the 1st tweet below to share this thread https://t.co/4pcJ2cWuoR

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".