More from itrade(DJ)

More from Optionslearnings

DJ SIR THREAD

Great video with points helpful for beginners.

Made 4 threads on DJ Sir with the help of @niki_poojary

1. Selecting strikes to trade in with risk management.
2. How he took some aggressive trades.
3. Multiple charts analysis for intraday trading.
4. Trade Setup


Attaching all threads made on DJ Sir. After watching the video you can refer to this tweet for notes about his strategy and learn a few other ideas.

Compiling these together for easy access to his knowledge.

1. Selecting strikes and risk


2. Going aggressive with help of data and


3. Intraday
As committed here goes the 2nd "Inside Candle" strategy:-

Queries can be posted on comments, video will take some time to come.

Want market influence to circulate it to reach max audiences.

@DillikiBiili @AnilSinghvi_ @anilbalaji11 @bankniftydoctor @brahmesh https://t.co/SmCZMMkBzV


Inside Candle Trading statergy

*15mints min time frame & more
*whenever you see 2nd(baby)candle
is forming inside of 1st(mother)candle
draw high and low of 1st(mother)candle and
take entry which side 3rd candle breaks
*stop loss - 1.someone can put sl at baby candle low

2.someone can put sl at mother candle low(both works)
*entry - 3rd candle breaking mother candle
*target - 1x2x3x of your risk

#candles could be any colour

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?