BC NOTION
Saved by @lenzfliker

Pricing freelancing projects.

Everything I've learned.

A thread.

 Having one pricing strategy that you can apply to every real-world engagement is often a fallacy.
Learn these pricing methodologies:

- Hourly billing
- Daily billing
- Retainers
- Fixed-pricing
- Value-based pricing

Understand their pros and cons.

Understand your circumstances.

Understand the project.

Choose appropriately.
Charging by the hour doesn't work in favour of freelancers.

If you need to use it to get started,

Stop using it as soon as you can.
Hourly billing is by far the worst pricing methodology to use for profit.
Hourly billing is by far the worst pricing methodology to use for efficiency.
Do you want to avoid:

- Estimating every small task?
- Filling out timesheets?
- Sending tons of invoices?
- Having to justify every time you go "over"?

Avoid hourly billing.
If you're instantly available, expect to be asked to lower your price.
There are two ways to bill daily:

1 day = 8 hours

Or

1 day = 1 day

Always use the latter.

The former robs you of your autonomy.
If you want to raise your rates in future,

When billing by the day,

Max out at selling 4 days per week to clients.

Give yourself time to grow your own business.
If you bill your client daily, you're giving them a day's work.

Nothing else.

It's a rolling engagement for a reason.

Day rate can't come with a guarantee of completion.
You can't charge a premium if your individual value isn't obvious.
Things that increase perceived value and thus project price:

- The scarcity of your time (availability)
- What you've done before (credibility)
- The project price itself
Proposals > estimates
Don't get tricked into sharing tons of project specific information in a proposal.

If you can't write a proposal without research then you need a pre-project.

Discovery work has value and should come at a price.
You don't have to use the same pricing methodology for every engagement.

Client 1: Day rate
Client 2: Fixed priced project
Client 3: Ongoing retainer

Use the strategy that fits the work best.
Sometimes pricing a freelancing project can be as simple as :

Freelancer: "I'm happy to do the work for this price".

Client: "I'm happy to pay this price for the work completing".
Rules for fixed-price projects:

1. Get a deposit
2. Get a fixed scope
3. To reduce the price you must reduce the scope
4. Don't use estimated days x day rate = price
5. Add a minimum 20% contingency
6. Price high enough to make a profit after you've paid yourself
Get.
A.
Deposit.
Remember that when you give a fixed-price for a scope of work,

You are guaranteeing completion.

Going back to the table for more money at this stage leaves a bad taste.
Fixed-price projects are highly beneficial to efficient freelancers.

*If* quality is retained.
Some people will pick the cheapest price because it's the cheapest.
Some people will pick the most expensive price because it's the most expensive.
If you're the most expensive option,

And a prospect who cares can't understand why,

Your positioning is off.

Price tells it's own story, but it needs back up from credibility.
The way that pricing methodologies are received differs from country to country.

Be aware of this when making offers.
Value-based pricing requires the most effort when making offers.

But you should still research your client when using other strategies.

How valuable will you be to them?
Value-based pricing TLDR version:

Your client's average lead value = £500

You estimate that your work will get them 100 leads in year 1.

That's £50,00 of value.

You give a price for your work based on a % of that figure.

If you can show the value, you can justify the price.
"Day rate" where you guarantee a set amount of logged hours is worse than billing hourly.

It's billing hourly for less money.
Retainer agreements are a useful safety strategy.
Give preference to retainer engagements that sell your availability to deliver knowledge, not your labour.
Estimates are never accurate.
Fixed-price terms are nearly always best.
When a hard deadline is introduced to a fixed-price project,

Add 20%.
If it's most risky for you to work with the client the price should be higher.

If it's most risky for the client to work with you the price will be lower

Price mirrors risk.
Never use your bottom line as your price.
Negotiate on terms, not price.
Reducing your price means reducing your perceived value.

*If* you don't also reduce scope.
If you think there's a chance you might kick yourself for not charging enough,

It'll probably happen during the project.

Add 20%.
Pricing freelancing projects is tough

There's no 1-size-fits-all solution

Understand each method

Have your preferences

Be aware of your position

Gauge what your clients are most likely to accept

Apply the most appropriate strategy to get the job at a price you're happy with

You May Also Like

Seth Abramson
Seth Abramson
@SethAbramson
(THREAD) Pre-election Russia collusion may take down Trump. It's equally possible the Trumps' pre- and post-election collusion with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Israel will do it—a course of collusion also connected to the Kremlin. I explain here. I hope you'll read on and retweet.


1/ I must stress how unbelievably complex the "Grand Bargain" theory of the Trump-Russia case is—a different thing from saying it's not substantiated. It's substantiated in *almost every single particular*—it just *also* happens to be very confusing. Not byzantine—just confusing.

2/ The basics: Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the UAE all view Iran as their chief regional enemy. Iran is propped up by Russia. Therefore the Saudis, Israelis, and Emiratis all need a US government willing to find a way to get the Kremlin to *stop* supporting Iran in the Middle East.

3/ The best way to get Russia to stop supporting Iran—or reduce support—was/is to drop all sanctions on Russia over its 2014 annexation of Crimea, as that'd be worth *trillions* to the Kremlin over the next decade. Everyone knew that Clinton wouldn't do this—and that Trump would.

4/ Per the NYT, on August 3, 2016, Donald Trump Jr. met secretly at Trump Tower with a Saudi and Emirati emissary, George Nader, as well as an Israeli intelligence expert, Joel Zamel, with *significant* ties to both Israeli intelligence *and* Russian oligarchs allied with Putin.
POLITICS
Dr. Jane Clare Jones
Dr. Jane Clare Jones
@janeclarejones
So, on the subject of bonkers hyperbolic pretzeling over the Bell judgement, Grace 'destroy books I don't like & make inappropriate jokes about sterilising teenage girls' Lavery has some thoughts.

Tell me why my feminism is wrong Grace.

Oh

Well, if anyone thought the Bell judgment was going to make TRAs reconsider making massively overblown claims with no evidence backed up with nothing but a thick wadge of emotional blackmail.... HAHAHA, no one thought that.


A high court in the UK made a delimited judgment about teenager's ability to consent to puberty blockers. This puts all trans people everywhere in the world at risk.

Because if any human anywhere has any thoughts that deviate in any way from the rote line dictated by

the trans rights movement, this puts all trans people everywhere in mortal danger.

Let's be honest Grace. It doesn't put trans people at risk. It puts trans ideology at risk. Because trans ideology depends on the idea of innate gender identity, and the trans child is the

necessary material evidence of the ontology of gender identity.

That is, children are being medicalised to provide evidence to underwrite adults identities.

Nothing to see here.
LAW
Advertisement
Brian Cates
Brian Cates
@drawandstrike
Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to


Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.

Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.

Mueller's team was 100% partisan.

That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election

They looked high.

They looked low.

They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.

And they found...NOTHING.

Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.

What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?

THERE WEREN'T ANY.

Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
POLITICS
Matt Fuller
Matt Fuller
@MEPFuller
They’re shooting into the chamber.
POLITICS
Mystery Grove Publishing Co.
Mystery Grove Publishi...
@MysteryGrove
By popular demand, here is the official Mystery Grove Film Recommendations list. Watch all of these in order if you want to truly understand the world we live in today.
CULTURE