When I wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times, there was a pretty extensive fact-checking process (shout out to @jdesmondharris). Apparently, that is not the case at the Wall Street Journal, at least when a piece advances a highly partisan, fundamentally racist view...
Practically every day, I wake up to a story about people inside Connecticut's impoverished cities squabbling over scraps because the town government system leaves them perennially underfunded and overburdened.
— D\xedgame Concejal (@RSGAT) January 26, 2018
School integration based on voluntary opt-in by affluent white parents can't work: they judge school quality not by accepted measures, but by relative whiteness and affluence. CT's town-based school district system makes this a self-fulfilling prophecy. https://t.co/v2kD6TBkn2
— D\xedgame Concejal (@RSGAT) January 29, 2020
More from News
1. This is NOT Nick Fuentes. Nick was not inside the Capitol building nor Nancy Pelosi’s office
2. Nick was wearing a suit the entire time.
3. Nick has never called for the killing of any state legislators during his show.
These are all mass lies and disinformation being put out there to slander his good name, get him deplatformed and perhaps try to get LEO’s to visit
We take all misinformation and slander very seriously. It’s one thing for a casual troll but it’s another when you threatened the ability of one to earn a living and to incriminate an innocent man. It’s disgusting and everyone involved should be ashamed.
We are looking to means to hold these actors accountable for their slanderous, and dangerous actions.
https://t.co/ESW2YPf0UG
This article is false and misleading. Nick was not in the capitol in Nancy Pelosi's office.
Remove this falsehood immediately.
The press are now also covering Durham's decision to hold the hearing into the complaint against Cllr Boyes behind closed doors. See this item by @JHarrisonLDR, which includes reference to representations by @GypsyTravellers for a public hearing.https://t.co/C6M4KR65cW https://t.co/LuS8jQ2moi
— Dermot Feenan (@dermotfeenan) December 15, 2020
The grounds for the complaint are already set out by me: https://t.co/0MDqO6dyja. In summary: on 7 May 2020, Cllr Boyes posted on a Facebook site he shared with another councillor a video of scorch damage from barbeque trays and littering on and around a picnic table.
[2/16]
For those unfamiliar with the details of this complaint, I set out the basis of the complaint in the following 7 images:
— Dermot Feenan (@dermotfeenan) November 11, 2020
[8/14] pic.twitter.com/wrU18mBlMa
The table was in a picnic area in a nature reserve in the Easington constituency which Cllr Boyes represents. The video was accompanied by a comment from Cllr Boyes linking the ‘state’ of the tables with Travellers. That post attracted a number of comments which he liked.
[3/16]
Those liked comments included:
▪️ ‘scum should be f**k*ng shot oxygen thieves’ [edited]
▪️ ‘And they wonder why many people do not welcome them’.
[4/16]
Cllr Boyes accepted at the hearing that he did not have proof that Travellers caused the damage and that it was wrong for him to so implicate Travellers.
[5/16]