The fund that doesn't deserve your money.
2/n
Funds That Don't Deserve Your Money.
Check your portfolio and do the cleanup!!
Read-Along 👇 1/n
https://t.co/8iyzIbPtKS
Funds That Don't Deserve Your Money.
— 1 Page Finance \U0001f4c4 (@1PageFinance) March 7, 2022
Check your portfolio and do the cleanup!!
Read-Along \U0001f447 1/n pic.twitter.com/NsHhvIjcKn
More from Mfs
A financial advisor that charges an annual fee of 1% on assets under management
Essentially takes 50% of your dividend income, if your portfolio yields 2%
That's substantially worse than the highest rate on qualified dividends of 23.80% today
Few understand this
I agree with this
Essentially takes 50% of your dividend income, if your portfolio yields 2%
That's substantially worse than the highest rate on qualified dividends of 23.80% today
Few understand this
I agree with this
After 34 years in the business, I just can\u2019t get my head around how an adviser can justify charging a client any more that $2,000 per year for financial advice, and 0.25% per year for asset management if needed. There may be outliers that cost more, but those are the expectation.
— Rick Ferri (@Rick_Ferri) June 15, 2021
You May Also Like
I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
Ironies of Luck https://t.co/5BPWGbAxFi
— Morgan Housel (@morganhousel) March 14, 2018
"Luck is the flip side of risk. They are mirrored cousins, driven by the same thing: You are one person in a 7 billion player game, and the accidental impact of other people\u2019s actions can be more consequential than your own."
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
