LTTS
Double Top Buy above 4854.36 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/KsAg2ZAwCF

LTTS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) March 2, 2021
Double Top Buy above 2753.05 daily close on 1% Box Size Chart and Double Top Buy active on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/5VpG2455C2 pic.twitter.com/q0yZXgqatt
More from Saket Reddy
Plotting sales CAGR for few gems in #chemicals, #pharma and #FMCG
— jeevan patwa (@jeevanpatwa) July 14, 2021
Majority has 20Y CAGR > 10Y > 5Y => growth is decelerating as base becomes big...
only outlier being #Deepaknitrate where
20Y CAGR < 10Y < 5Y => accelerating growth... pic.twitter.com/ewpFeKmxQo
More from Ltts
Objective is to move higher towards Fibonacci extension
6.857%..(6892)
#Probability
#LTTS-4897
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribes) (@idineshptl) October 14, 2021
Sustain rise above 4.618%(4967)
Upside projection ploted on chart
6.857%(6892)#Probability https://t.co/h28c8TImIG
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
One of the oddest features of the Labour tax row is how raising allowances, which the media allowed the LDs to describe as progressive (in spite of evidence to contrary) through the coalition years, is now seen by everyone as very right wing
— Tom Clark (@prospect_clark) November 2, 2018
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party