As humans, we are biased on:
- feelings
- emotions
- conditions
Rebuild yourself with a learning MIND
If you're to build a better future:
- accept the past
- move forward
- build a life
The hell with conditions. Create!
3 simple steps to build a better future
// thread //
As humans, we are biased on:
- feelings
- emotions
- conditions
Rebuild yourself with a learning MIND
If you're to build a better future:
- accept the past
- move forward
- build a life
The hell with conditions. Create!
Building is a straightforward process.
Confidence is in keep track of your progress. That's how people win!
All you need:
- a pen
- a notebook
- an open mind
Win in your mind. Win in your life.
Begin with the END in mind.
Every. Single. Day.
Even on days, you don't feel like it, showing up makes all difference.
70% of people who start a plan, quit.
Except YOU. Not. This. Time.
Giving up is a decision.
Consistency is a lifestyle!
Worrying is a formula for failure.
Instead, observe your thoughts:
- what are they?
- who is involved?
- where do they go?
Self-awareness is a superpower.
A powerful mind is:
• aware of its experiences
• change the way it thinks
Learn to observe & let go!
Rule #1:
Don't set goals for things you can't control. Focus on what matters.
The fastest way to fail:
- letting emotions dictate
- seeking others’ approval
- moving forward with an “old” mind
Begin with the END in mind!
Familiarity is a WIN for your mind.
Once you know your thoughts, grab your notepad and write down.
Write down where you want in:
- in a month
- six months
- five years
Reverse the engineering by looking ourself in the next 5 years!
Take risk. Change your life.
1. Consistency = Stay focused to win
2. Observe = Change your lifestyle
3. Create = Define your success
Focus on your strengths, not your weaknesses!
Think like a scientist. Practice critical thinking.
Start reading 100 Mental Models:
https://t.co/izsgzOLsVC
Follow @MentorsQuotes1 for insights and daily motivation.
If you like this thread, retweet the first post. https://t.co/RRK7OWn0U8
3 simple steps to build a better future
— Positive Call (@Positive_Call) April 8, 2021
// thread //
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.