Judge enters and proceedings commence.
#Assange

Now waiting for Julian Assange to be brought into court
Assange enters, gives his name and date of birth
Clair Dobbin, representing the US government rises to object to bail
Says Assange has previously "gone to extraordinary lengths to avoid extradition."
Says any appeal "would be rendered academic," if Assange was not remanded in custody.
Dobbin says Assange attempted to assist NSA whistleblower Edward Snowdon avoid a trial for leaking NSA documents by helping him fly to Russia
Dobbin says he court should not doubt Assange's ability to flee the country, notes the president of Mexico has already offered him political asylum.
"He is capable of going to any lengths," Dobbin says
The US government counsel now quoting a previous High Court judgment denying Assange bail.
Says Assange staying in the Equadorian embassy cost taxpayers £16m adding that he has "no respect for the law"
Dobbin "He was given the opportunity to get bail [over the Swedish case] and he squandered it."
Dobbin says that flight is a "likelihood,"
Adds that Covid 19 outbreaks in prison are a matter for the Ministry of Justice not the court, and there is now a special area of Belmarsh for them to be isolated in.
Breaking: US government lawyer confirms they will be appealing the judgment at the High Court.
Notes of appeal being drafted
Counsel for the US government summarising the grounds on which they will be appealing Mondays judgment, says "it is impossible," for someone to commit suicide in the conditions Mr Assange will be held in.
Judge interrupts says there is no need for Dobbin to go into detail about their grounds for appeal to the High court, "It doesn't serve any purpose in a bail hearing."
#Assange
Dobbin ends her submissions saying "There are insurmountable circumstances," to stop bail
Edward Fitzgerald QC, for Assange, rises to make the case for bail.
Says to judge, "Your decision [to deny extradition] changes everything, notes his client has been detained for 15 months due to this US government request.
"It doesn't matter how many goals you score, what matters is the outcome" Fitzgerald says. Once the application has been rejected the presumption should be "liberty."
Fitzgerald notes an appeal is not even certain as quoting an interview from a US prosecutor saying president elect Biden may decide not to pursue the matter further.
Fitzgerald, "A court saying I discharge you, should at least mean a person getting conditional liberty."
(This is the article Fitzgerald is referring to)

https://t.co/HjOWMJAqVN
Counsel says that the judgment not to extradite Assange gives him a huge motive to stay in the UK as he knows he is protected from extradition to the USA here, which he would not be if he went to another country
Fitzgerald says situation is totally different from 2012, especially given the virus outbreak

50% of prisoners on Assange's wing either have, or have had Covid he says.
Judge queries the 50% covid figure, asks where information came from?
Fitzgerald says it's from his instructing solicitor, who hasn't been allowed into court.
Dobbin interrupts to quote an email from Belmarsh prison saying only 3 positive cases at the current time.
Judge says she is minded to accept the evidence on Covid from the prison, not the defence.
Fitzgerald says whatever the figures Assange would still be safer at home with his family rather than in prison.
Defence move on, notes High court usually accepts that a district judge's findings of fact.
Quotes precedents, including the Lauri Love case.
Assange has no reason to abscond, counsel says, and notes this would be his first ever opportunity to live with his family.
"He's had a ruling ordering his discharge," he says
Says the conditions of bail would amount to "virtual house arrest," anyway
Defence say "Everything has changed," since Assange absconded in 2012, he will also wear a GPS tag giving real time information on his location at all times
Asks judge to consider "humanitarian reasons," for giving bail.
"There is an overwhelming case for bail," Fitzgerald says.
Asks "How on earth is he going to get to Mexico?" And says the asylum offer from there only applied after all legal proceedings ended.
"It's not even clear there will be an appeal," Fitzgerald says, court takes a 10 minute break so defence can take instructions from Mr Assange
Back at 11.15.
#Assange

More from Legal

Absolutely fascinating thread as @jsralton & others track down the identity of key players in the Capitol Hill breach.

Including highly decorated ex-members of the military.

The double wrist ties, tasers, discarded weapons all show an intention to go much further than they got


Seems so ordinary, becoming Lieutenant Commander Brock in the US Airforce ...yet the conversion from the ordinary into the extremist will make a fascinating study for psychologists @RichardBentall


His claim that he picked up the wrist ties “someone” had dropped so he could hand them into police is laughable.

And when you think about it rather cowardly. Can’t even take responsibility for what he has done.

Who else were involved in the planning? Which mates of his?

The attention to detail in making the links is impressive.

There’s going to be a lot more doors knocked in in the next few weeks.

How high and how deep into the Trump establishment does it go.?


H/T @k8tshires for this summary from CNN

If the people involved in this insurrection succeeded where would the establishment face of the movement be?

I suspect not making the denouncements they are now that it
More severe police injuries and deaths on that one day of rampaging Trumpers than in five years of Anti-Police protests.


You can tell a lot about the stance of a angry crowd by whether they come with shields or pitchforks.

If people protesting police brutality for years had wanted to use their large numbers to attack, maim and kill police, they damn well could have.

But they came to resist police.

Which is completely different.

Why did the police suffer more at the hands of those who claimed to support them and waved their flags than at the hands of those who think they should be defunded or abolished?

Because one group is literally arguing for human dignity and the other glorifies violence.

The people who uncritically support police brutality are those who believe that instrumental violence should be a standard tool in response to those standing opposed to you.

Once you accept that... WHO is standing opposed to you doesn't matter much.

You May Also Like