It’s pupillage season with the Gateway opening. I’m not on the pupillage committee at @5SAHLaw but I do deal with mini-pupillages. This is a thread for aspiring barristers applying for both pupillages and mini-pupillages. I hope it helps some of you through a difficult process.

1/ What makes a good application is to an extent subjective. I hope I’ve pulled out some key features which are universally accepted as being important, and will hopefully improve your application and your chances of an interview. Disclaimer: these are all my opinions of course.
2/ PROOF READ. Seriously, proof read it again, and again. Take a break for a day and proof it again. Print it off and read it out loud. Get rid of any typos, spelling or grammatical errors. Your application represents you it should not be sloppy.
3/ Please use the correct name of the chambers you apply to. You wouldn’t believe it but I receive mini applications for other chambers. Given the number of applications received for pupillage received don’t let a mistake like this damage your chances.
4/ Be succinct. Don’t use 10 words when 4 will do. The word limit is a limit not a target. Don’t use flowery adjectives. Bullet points can work. Your audience is a lawyer, make the language direct and driven. Being succinct takes time, strip out non-essential words & information.
5/ Make sure you know what your point is. Make sure it is answering the question. Each sentence should be driven to the conclusion you are building too. Examples work well to answer questions and will automatically make your application less generic and more personal.
6/ If you’re applying off of Gateway and a cover letter is requested, format it like a letter. Other formatting should be “justified.” Formatting is important. As a lawyer your written work represents you. As an aspiring lawyer it still represents you. Make it presentable.
7/ Why do you want to be a barrister? An awful and difficult question. Avoid generic statements. Think about why you do. The question is not why you deserve to be a barrister. Think about applying your experiences to make the answer personal.
8/ Why these chambers? The real answer to this may be “because you’re offering a pupillage” but you can’t say that. If you’ve done a mini there, draw on that. If you want to practise in a certain area that chambers undertake, explain that. Doing that will make it personal.
9/ The work experience part of the form is important. Listing a million minis may be of limited value. Target your work experience and explain it, it is another chance for you to demonstrate skills you have. What skills did you learn?
10/ But seriously, if you did a mini on a serious trial don’t say you authored a legal argument or came up with a point that the barrister then used in their closing speech. They were probably being nice to you. Don’t overstate your achievements – keep it accurate.
11/ Don’t undervalue your non-legal work experience. Many barristers worked part-time during university. Don’t be afraid to draw them out the skills it gave you. We can’t all do 3 months work pro bono in some tropical climate, although if you have good for you, include that too.
12/ JUDGEMENT. Exercise it. This is what the job is really about, recognising strengths and weaknesses of factual circumstances. This applies to your application and equally to interviews, pleas in mitigation will have weak aspects. Focus on the good points. Wear the bad.
13/ It’s a numbers game. Start now. Apply to the maximum number of sets you can. The odds are against you statistically. The more apps the better your chances. But don’t let the number of apps impact on the quality of each one. It’s time consuming but you have to do it right.

More from Legal

BREAKING: at least six men that provided security for Roger Stone entered the #Capitol during the siege, per a @nytimes visual investigation.

All six are associated with the far-right #OathKeepers militia.

THREAD 1/

Story: https://t.co/abZlcVyaR6


2/ On January 5th, Stone appeared at the Supreme Court, glad-handing and being driven in a go-kart. Later he attended a rally near the White House.

As the @nytimes team shows, his security entourage featured a host of #OathKeepers...


3/ In the morning of the 6th, Stone stood outside the Willard InterContinental hotel, again flanked by men associated with the #OathKeepers.

Some of them, like Rob Minuta, have been named in prior


4/ Interesting detail: while scrutinizing the video of Roger Stone I spotted Rudy Giuliani exiting the same hotel.

Giuliani is accompanied by a man wearing the same outfit as Trump supporter John Eastman & other not-yet ID'd people.

Video source: https://t.co/Rure8TiQTp


5/ Now to the #Capitol: We see a several of Roger Stone's #OathKeeper guards amidst a larger group yelling at police. Video surfaced by the @CTExposers team.👇👇

https://t.co/NWsONDz0OA
Without jumping to conclusions, this is a strange coincident. Is someone trying to kill two birds with one stone?


If you don't get caught up in the noise of the media, you'll notice a few more things. The far-right Oath Keepers has been patrolling major cities with heavy weapons for weeks. They were present in numbers at the Capitol, but without weapons.


https://t.co/t7M1svIIMe


You find photos of the arrested vandals but strangely enough not of the one 70-year-old who allegedly had a truck full of weapons. And at least I couldn't find an image of that truck. But the old man was apparently very talkative to the police.


The most questionable aspect, however, is the FBI's search for a person who was apparently caught on a surveillance camera the previous night.
At that time, it was possible to predict a mass gathering, but not the riot.

You May Also Like

1. Project 1742 (EcoHealth/DTRA)
Risks of bat-borne zoonotic diseases in Western Asia

Duration: 24/10/2018-23 /10/2019

Funding: $71,500
@dgaytandzhieva
https://t.co/680CdD8uug


2. Bat Virus Database
Access to the database is limited only to those scientists participating in our ‘Bats and Coronaviruses’ project
Our intention is to eventually open up this database to the larger scientific community
https://t.co/mPn7b9HM48


3. EcoHealth Alliance & DTRA Asking for Trouble
One Health research project focused on characterizing bat diversity, bat coronavirus diversity and the risk of bat-borne zoonotic disease emergence in the region.
https://t.co/u6aUeWBGEN


4. Phelps, Olival, Epstein, Karesh - EcoHealth/DTRA


5, Methods and Expected Outcomes
(Unexpected Outcome = New Coronavirus Pandemic)