BC LABTHEFT
Saved by @rubic3n

中共掌握和开发致命细菌作为生化战争性武器 — （以色列军情局）

请看如何几十年如何培养输出“人才”偷窃西方知识产权

华裔细菌贼 邱香果和老公陈可定

19年7月 间谍夫妇及其中国学生被带离🇨🇦曼尼托巴国家微生物实验室，曼尼托巴大学宣布解雇邱氏夫妇

请往下看他们和这次武汉病毒的关系

 邱香果所在的国家微生物实验室是加拿大唯一一家4级安全级别的病毒学实验室，是北美少数几个具备处理埃博拉病毒等要求最高密封级别病原体的实验室之一，也是全球15个具有四级生物安全水平的实验室之一，在整个加拿大也仅此一个。
1964年生

1980年 16岁考上河北医学院
1985年毕业于河北医科大学
1990年天津医科大学 免疫学 研究生

很多资料里她掩盖了1996年作为访问科学家到了休斯顿的MD Anderson 癌症中心⚠️

1997年 曼尼托巴大学癌症治疗中心作为助理研究员
2003年 加入国家微生物实验室特殊病原体项目
一起被调查的其夫程克定（Cheng Keding，音译）也是一名曾参与埃博拉病毒治疗和防御的生物学家，曾发表过爱滋病、SARS和大肠肝菌等方面的论文。

夫妇两人一直使用中国留学生团队 而且和武汉病菌研究所有合作
MD Anderson引发的约印大通

大家看 这可是王岐山的
#wangqishan

这个邱香果夫妇一直和天津医学院有联系

https://t.co/tjOj2REzuf https://t.co/eBXmw1qxr4
加拿大媒体最新调查发现，在邱博士被带离前两个月，她所在的加拿大国家微生物实验室通过加航向中国发送活体伊博拉病毒和亨尼帕病毒，目的地是北京。

事发前邱香果担任实验室特殊病毒项目组——疫苗开发和抗病毒治疗小组组长，专门负责实验室伊博拉病毒相关研究工作
这批病毒是绕过实验室的工作程序，被运往中国科学院(Chinese Academy of Sciences)，而且没有附带文件保障加拿大的知识产权。在国家微生物实验室从事尖端并需要高密闭High Containment研究的研究人员，不允许在未经谘询知识产权办公室以及未达成物料移送协议的情况下，将任何东西运送到其他国家实验室
96年 她是作为千人计划进入美国 然后转战加拿大实验室

多年来 邱香果带了大批的中国学生 和中国大学有定期访问

看 她和清华一起研发的Ebola抗体
奇怪的是 ZMapp是一家加州的公司在生产疫苗 查查是不是江绵恒的呀？！

https://t.co/Iraic6qnyU
加拿大CBC所获旅行文件显示，邱香果，在2017-2018年至少五次前往中国，其中包括一次在中国新设立的4级实验室培训科技人员，该实验室从事最致命的病原体研究。

武汉P4实验室！？！

https://t.co/FyUUWrbFN5
看这儿！

武汉病毒实验室被认可从事三类病毒的研究：埃博拉，刚果-克里米亚出血热以及尼帕病毒。

这不都是香果同志偷运出加拿大实验室的？！
武汉 武汉 武汉
王岐山 孟建柱

加拿大骑警今年7月份对邱香果进行调查，并将其带离实验室。新曝光的文件显示，邱香果曾连续两年受邀，前往中国科学院武汉国家生物安全实验室，一年两次，每次长达两周。加拿大公共卫生局称邱的行为有可能“违反政策”。
共产党露馅了
美国加拿大已经掌握了情报

CBC所获文件显示，“邱的访问由第三方资助”，但文件中第三方的名称被抹掉。在2017年9月19日至30日的行程中，她还会见了北京的合作者，会见者的名字也被抹掉。
中国政府介绍她时误导人民认为香果同志是发明ZMapp的药物。 其实是不正确，她只是帮助研发，没有知识产权！

警方文件显示，在香果同志去中国访问时，还访问了中国科学院、清华大学及中国医学科学院等学术机构，并在多个会议上发表讲话。
这个2018/4/5 CCTV就是证明

病毒是从武汉毒库里流出
而且党有疫苗了
那为什么还不给病人？
准备什么时候“救火”？

https://t.co/QzQKS4CfM4 https://t.co/ttUEN9jzb4
2014年 加拿大政府声称，中国是加拿大国家研究委员会网络攻击背后主导

其实香果夫妇只是千人计划的两个人，还有更多科学家在为中共偷知识产权
英国《每日邮报》称，实际上，美国科学家早就警告，病毒有可能从位于武汉病毒研究所的P4实验室“逃脱”出来。

马里兰州生物安全顾问Tim Trevan早在2017年就在《自然》期刊上发表评论说，他担心中共体制下所创造的文化会使这个研究所变得不安全
武汉P4实验室研究全球最危险的病原体。此外，实验室还进行动物研究。但和西方国家相比，在中国，动物研究的规则要宽松得多。这也是Trevan所担心的地方。

去年，美国国务院年度武器条约遵守情况报告指出，中共在从事一些可能支持生物战的活动。
报告说：“信息表明，在报告期内，中共从事了可能具有双重用途的生物活动，这引起外界对其是否遵守《生物武器公约》的担忧。”

美国怀疑中共未能取消其生物战项目，没有遵守公约的要求。美国还担心，中共的毒素研发项目可能会带来潜在的生物威胁。
1999年，法国里昂设立了全欧洲规模最大的病毒研究中心，2003年，中国科学院就向法国政府提出协助中国开设同类病毒研究中心的要求。

中方的要求引发法国政府以及病毒专家们之间的分歧，法国有专家担心中方会使用法国提供的技术来研制化学武器，法国情报部门当时向政府提出严正警告
但是在时任总理拉法兰（共产党老朋友）的支持下，中法于2004年希拉克访华期间签署了合作协议。法国将协助中国建设P4病毒中心，但协议规定北京不能将此技术用于攻击性活动。

法国对外安全总局指出，武汉这个实验室和中国人民解放军有关
法国里昂的一家建筑设计所RTV原定负责该实验室的工程，但2005年中国官方选择武汉当地设计所IPPR中元国际工程有限公司负责工程，而根据法国安全部门的调查，IPPR设计所与中国军队下属部门有密切关联，这些部门早已是美国中央情报部门的监督目标。
一个邪恶政府手上掌握剧毒
西方政府的忧虑应验

法国政府官员向记者表示，中方在十多年的合作过程中多次违背承诺，比如说，中方当初承诺仅仅在武汉修建唯一的一个实验室，而今天发现，中方已经修建了多个实验室，而且某些实验室十分可疑。
https://t.co/bgcv3TQ493
加拿大这个实验室是中共把香果夫妇派过去的

由于实验室长期提供广泛的冠状病毒检验服务，曾分离并提供严重急性呼吸道症候群（SARS）最早的基因组序列，二○○四年还验出另一种冠状病毒NL63，导致该实验室被中国间谍锁定。

https://t.co/6UQa9fLY78
早在2012年6月，一名60岁的沙乌地阿拉伯男子在沙国吉达一家医院就诊，出现发烧、咳嗽、咳痰与呼吸急促等症状。埃及病毒学家萨基从他的肺部验出一种前所未见的冠状病毒。萨基延请荷兰伊拉斯莫斯医学中心病毒学家福希耶提供建议。福希耶再交给加国国家微生物实验室，据传此病毒是中国特务从该实验室窃取

You May Also Like

Michael King \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8
Michael King 🇺🇸...
@8MichaelKing
Ever notice how the top niches are centered around health, wealth, and relationships?

There's a deep-rooted psychological (and biological) reason why.

And today, I'm gonna to explain all of it so you can start profiting off of this knowledge 💰💰

*Now, this thread is going to be long and in depth. Make sure to favorite the top tweet now so you can come back to it later.

So. Down to the very core of every living being (humans, dolphins, bacteria, aliens), there are only two drivers:
1. To survive
2. To reproduce

Right off the bat, we know that sex is a primary driver to human behavior.

This would also mean that each gender has its own insecurities regarding sex.

Men have a subconscious fear that their woman will leave them for someone more successful

Women have a fear that their man will leave them for someone younger & better-looking

We can conclude that men are attracted to looks, and women are attracted to status.

This is human nature down to its very core.

Crazy, blue-haired feminists will try to argue and say otherwise.

But, 50 years of feminism DOES NOT OVERRIDE millions of years of evolutionary biology.

Here's a quick visualization exercise so you can see how true all this is...
STARTUPS
Vibhu Vashisth
Vibhu Vashisth
@VIBHU_Tweet
Do you know?

Multiverse is mentioned in several of Hindu Scriptures.

In 1927 came a theory named 'Big Bang' which was a scientific effort to provide some explanation about how our Universe came into existence. It suggested that Universe started as a tiny, hot and dense...


...something that expanded rapidly from the singularity with a big explosion or Big Bang from which formed the galaxies, stars and the rest of the Universe.
However, the science in our Vedas explained these concepts since millennia. Rig Veda mentions Hiranyagarbha and Brahmanda..

...Visphotak which talks about a similar theory.
The concept of Parallel universes may be novel to the modern scientists but it rests very comfortably in ancient Hindu Cosmology. The Puranas are replete with descriptions of many worlds whose inhabitants are ruled by kings in...


...the human plane and Gods in a higher plane. The many Gods in turn belong to many different worlds and planes of existence. At the highest level of hierarchy are the trinity namely Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesha, ruling the divine Kingdoms. Brahma is the creator who dreams...


...the Universe into being, which is maintained by Vishnu. What Humans perceive as reality is in fact the dream of Brahma, misled by matter. Brahman( not to be confused with Brahma) is the ground of all reality & existence. Brahman is uncreated,external, infinite & all-embracing.
ALL
Advertisement
Jaya_Upadhyaya
Jaya_Upadhyaya
@Jayalko1
DODDA GANAPATHI, BENGALURU
#karnatakatemples

Dodda in Kannada means big. Sri Ganesha here is 18 ft tall in height and 16 ft wide. Dodda Ganesha is also known as Shakthi Ganapathi and Satya Ganapathi.

It is said that Kempe Gowda, the founder of Bengaluru, saw a rock here.


The rock had engravings of Ganesha. His sculptors cut the Ganesha murti from that single rock. Later, a shrine was built around the Ganesh murti.

It is believed that Dodda Ganapathi is the protector of Bengaluru. All auspicious events start by praying to Him.


Benne Alankara is the most famous festival here when about 100 kg of butter is coated over Ganapathi every four years and the rich prasad is offered to the worshippers.

Ganesha is also covered in cream colour and is decorated with golden laces and buttons
@GampaSD


The Dodda Ganapathi murti is believed to be still growing in size, especially towards right.

The weavers from old Bengaluru tie a coconut to their looms before starting work. When the work is completed, they break 100 coconuts here along with the one tied on the loom.
ALL
Hector Navarro
Hector Navarro
@Hectorisfunny
I'm going to attempt to chronologically list all of the Marvel characters Stan Lee had a hand in creating. Working with his genius collaborators, Stan and his team produced an insane amount of iconic characters in a roughy ten year period. (Thread)


With his younger brother, writer Larry Lieber, and Jack "the King" Kirby:

Groot

Tales to Astonish #13 (November, 1960)


With writer Lieber, and artist Kirby:

Fin Fang Foom

Strange Tales #89 (October, 1961)


With the King, Stan gives birth to the Marvel Universe:

The Fantastic Four

Fantastic Four #1 (November, 1961)


With Jack Kirby:

Mister Fantastic

Fantastic Four #1 (November, 1961)
CULTURE
Marc K\xf6hlbrugge
Marc Köhlbrugge
@marckohlbrugge
💬 I often get Q’s like these:

How did you get your first customers for WIP? How did you grow BetaList’s traffic? Etc.

Makers are looking to reverse-engineer success. I see it everywhere.

I don’t think it works that way and the answers to those questions are mostly useless. 💥

I have built dozens of different products over the last couple of years. The vast majority failed. 😭

Surely if I know the answers to these questions, but still fail over and over again, these answers aren’t that useful. 🤷‍♀️

So what’s a better question to ask? 🤔

99.9% of the questions I receive are about the products that did well. In a way that makes sense, because we quickly forget about those that didn’t succeed.

🧠 This is known as survivorship bias.

Focusing on what survived, while ignoring what made it survive in the first place.

The real question, what you really want to know, is this:

What makes @WIP, @BetaList, and to some extent @AllStartupJobs succeed where my countless other attempts failed?

What separates a failed product 👎 from a successful product 👍?

Honestly, I don’t know. I wish I did.

It’s like Steve Jobs said “I’ll know it when I see it.” 👀

Same is true when we make products. We don’t know upfront what will work. But once we see an inkling of a product that does have potential, it’s not that hard to spot.
STARTUPS