According to management, KPRMILL's 4.2Cr pieces garmenting facility is expected to be commissioned by Q2FY22 & fully ramped up by Q2FY23.

At realisation of Rs.150/piece, the facility would generate incremental revenue of ~600Cr, (2.5x Asset turns).

Current revenues are 3500Cr!

The new sugar and ethanol plant
is expected to be commissioned in Q3FY22. With the new expanded capacity in the sugar biz, the management is aiming at overall sugar revenues to cross 1000Cr in next 2 to 3 years.

Current Sugar revenues are 496Cr.
Considering the CAPEX being ramped up and current growth prospects, KPRMILL can notch revenues of Rs. 4800Cr and over Rs. 1100Cr EBITDA in FY23.

ROCE could improve as Garmenting CAPEX can generate 30% ROCE & Ethanol CAPEX 22%.
KPRMILL strategically has a vertically integrated alignment from yarn to apparels.
This has translated into lower RM volatility and steady EBITDA margins over the years.
Higher proportion of garmenting enhances overall margin profile as the segment yields over 20% margins.

More from Saket Reddy

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.