*** THREAD ***

Three really useful Google Chrome extensions for Google Classroom.

1️⃣

Mote: voice notes and feedback.

This is an efficient tool for recording and posting verbal feedback. Mote is fully integrated into Google Docs, Slides, Sheets and Google Classroom. This makes it incredibly accessible and easy to use.
The mote icon (purple) appears in the 'private comments' box when you view submissions in GC. You simply click on the icon and record. With voice recording one click away, it is easy and quick to use. You only get 30 seconds but this encourages succinct, precise feedback.
It's great that you can view the document you are providing feedback on whilst recording. This helps to ensure specificity. For example, you can highlight specific examples from a student's work and then talk through them. This sort of thing prevents me from waffling, anyway.
There are other benefits too:
- Verbal feedback can be transcribed, with the option to review and change before posting.
- Mote supports transcription in more than 20 languages.
2️⃣

Google Dictionary.

This is great. A real game changer for students, I think. Once added as an extension, students can simply double click on any word they do not understand when using Chrome's browser and a definition will instantly pop up.
This simple add-on helps to ensure students' attention is maintained, which is particularly important when they are contending with many distractions online. Crucially, students do not need to open a separate tab. This eliminates 'task switching' which can decrease efficiency.
I really like that pupils can opt to hear the pronunciation of new or unfamiliar words, too. This is an added bonus.
If students encounter an unfamiliar word in a Google Slides/Doc that you have shared, they can still easily access the definition without straying from your material. They simply copy the word into a box that pops up when they click on the Google Dictionary icon on the task bar.
3️⃣

Kami

Kami is basically a PDF, document annotation and mark-up tool. It works pretty seamlessly with Google Drive. With a good range of mark up tools, it's great for accessing and annotating PDFs - this can be done live or in advance for asynchronous lessons.
You can click on the Kami icon on the task bar and instantly upload a PDF direct from Google Drive.
With Kami, I don't have to avoid using my PDF exemplar material, nor do I need to spend valuable time typing up responses for annotation. Once uploaded to Kami, I can begin using the wide range of annotation tools available.
One thing I really missed early on during remote teaching periods is collaborative annotation. With Kami, pupils can jointly annotate PDFs with ease. As Kami is fully integrated, sharing to Google Drive and then Google Classroom is simple.
Most exemplar material (for English anyway) is long. Kami enables me to chunk annotation tasks like I would if I were in the classroom. For example, I can predetermine the focus for annotation and direct students to focus on annotating specific parts of an exemplar.
Students can easily post replies to annotations. Likewise, teachers can reply to their students' ideas. This opportunity for dialogue makes it a truly collaborative tool, which I like. I find this ideal for smaller classes, to be honest - such as AS or A2 classes.
You don't even need to type annotations because you can just as easily - with one click - post voice notes.
Kami has lots of other features. For example students can just as easily collaborate on a blank sheet similar to Jamboard. I've only recently begun using Kami, though, so I'm still a novice.

#remotelearning
#GoogleClassroom
#edutwitter
#education

More from Internet

We’ve spent the last ten months building #CitizenBrowser, a project that aims to peek inside the Black Box of social media algorithms, by building a nationwide panel to share data with us. Today, we are publishing our first story from the project. /1

.@corintxt crunched the numbers and found that after Facebook flipped the switch for political ads, partisan content elbowed out reputable news outlets in our panelists’ news feeds.
https://t.co/Z0kibSBeQZ /2

You can learn more in our methodology, where we describe how we did this and what steps we took to ensure that we preserved the panelists' privacy. https://t.co/UYbTXAjy5i /3

Personally, this project is the culmination of years of experiments trying to figure out how to collect data from social media platforms in a way that can lead to meaningful reporting. I’ve described a couple of highlights below 👇 /4

My first attempt was in 2016 at Propublica, when I was working with @JuliaAngwin . We were interested in seeing if there was a difference in the Ad interests FB disclosed to users in their settings and the interests they showed to marketers. /5
Well, this should be a depressing read -- notably because the UK and the US are both terrible when it comes to data protection, but the UK appears to be getting a pass. So much for 'adequacy'.


A few initial thoughts on the Draft Decision on UK Adequacy: https://t.co/ncAqc93UFm

The decision goes into great detail about the state of the UK surveillance system, and notably, "bulk acquisition" of data, and I think I get their argument. /1

For one, while the UK allows similar "bulk powers," it differs from the US regime both in terms of proportionality, oversight, and even notice. Some of this came about after the Privacy International case in 2019 (Privacy International) v Investigatory
Powers Tribunal [2019]) /2

Whereas, other bits were already baked in by virtue of the fact that the Human Rights Act is a thing (This concept doesn't exist in the US; rather we hand-wave about the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and then selectively apply it) /3

For example, UK bulk surveillance (I'm keeping this broad, but the draft policy breaksk it down), substantially limits collection to three agencies: MI5, MI6, and GHCQ). By contrast, it's a bit of a free-for-all in the US, where varying policies /4

You May Also Like

The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.


This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/


A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/

https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/

https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
"I really want to break into Product Management"

make products.

"If only someone would tell me how I can get a startup to notice me."

Make Products.

"I guess it's impossible and I'll never break into the industry."

MAKE PRODUCTS.

Courtesy of @edbrisson's wonderful thread on breaking into comics –
https://t.co/TgNblNSCBj – here is why the same applies to Product Management, too.


There is no better way of learning the craft of product, or proving your potential to employers, than just doing it.

You do not need anybody's permission. We don't have diplomas, nor doctorates. We can barely agree on a single standard of what a Product Manager is supposed to do.

But – there is at least one blindingly obvious industry consensus – a Product Manager makes Products.

And they don't need to be kept at the exact right temperature, given endless resource, or carefully protected in order to do this.

They find their own way.