#IEX
This is a cash cow in my portfolio, expect it to create wealth in the form of dividends and share buybacks.
I view this a technology company that happens to be in the business of energy exchange.

More from Tar ⚡
More from Iex
Indian Energy Exchange (IEX) - hope what I wrote would help you to change your psychology. Ride the winners without any bias with a proper SL in place.
Updated chart https://t.co/GABkSthg5L
Updated chart https://t.co/GABkSthg5L

Indian Energy Exchange (IEX) - because you missed the 1st BO maybe at 200/300/400/500 therefore, your brain will keep on saying you - "now it is expensive" but it will keep on going up troubling you more. Perfect trait of a marathon runner. Follow the price with SL. pic.twitter.com/cKH3vnG05l
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) September 28, 2021
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".