Hindcopper yet to cross 158.
Once close above 158 more momentum. Till then ping pong to continue
Hindcopper Update 25.07.2021
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) July 25, 2021
Stock has given breakout from falling trendline with volume which is important signal.
Above 151 a good trend change signal.
Stock can do 200-212 once starts trading above 158+
SL 135. View gets negated below 135#Hindcopper #Bullish pic.twitter.com/82q9NKSqmd
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
155-175 Major support and also retest of breakout.
275-220 Probabable targets in medium term.
#PRAJIND https://t.co/dsbj25WPbQ

Thanks. Praj Industries perfect smart distribution. More weakness below 336. Rise to 355-365 can face selling pressure.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 10, 2021
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU pic.twitter.com/mKwgDwreaU
#Hindcopper https://t.co/KMpDhWTc53

#hindcopper
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 29, 2021
1. Given sell at 170-175 zone when it made a distribution pattern for targets 120 and 95
2. Stock is heading towards 90-95 and wont be suprised to see 75-80 levels in panic
3. Stock is clearly in down trend and till we see a turn around I would like to wait and watch pic.twitter.com/IfGNEwcPD9
Previous low 135 can be the SL for longs.
Possible short term bottom here CONFIRMATION ABOVE 158 for further upside
Hindcopper -- Expect Buying interest once price cross/close above 157-158 zone pic.twitter.com/GfRd1yHFpH
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) July 5, 2021
Till it breakouts expect pendulum swings within this structure.
I am positive for 19300-20000 above 18350.
Bottoms 16800-17000 in place and 200dema at 16600. Dont see any big cut. @moneyworks4u_fa https://t.co/lceGFlDyRM

#Nifty taking a shape of triangle rather than CNH.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) January 29, 2022
Confirmation point is same 18350 and targets also same as below \U0001f447
Traingle /CNH whats in a name as long as targets and Confirmation point is same. https://t.co/vfM1odTd94
More from Hindcopper
#Hindcopper https://t.co/KMpDhWTc53

#hindcopper
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 29, 2021
1. Given sell at 170-175 zone when it made a distribution pattern for targets 120 and 95
2. Stock is heading towards 90-95 and wont be suprised to see 75-80 levels in panic
3. Stock is clearly in down trend and till we see a turn around I would like to wait and watch pic.twitter.com/IfGNEwcPD9
Copper break below 4.43 qualify as bearish Flag and pole
HINDCOPPER break below 157 qualify as bearish Flag n pole.
Impact copper can test 4.28-4.20
HINDCOPPER can test 150-141 as per pattern targets.
165-166 Lakshman Rekha.
Quiz - Hindcopper
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) June 9, 2021
What pattern do you see?
whats the confirmation level and impact ?
Both are interlinked. https://t.co/0gVaRXd4pS pic.twitter.com/Bbs1rdaOWf
Longs Alert take care. Stock looks weak to me below 135.
#hindcopper https://t.co/hnXBWmcPEX

Hindcopper unable to cross 158 and required bullish momentum missing.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 9, 2021
Closing below 135 is weak signal.
Would like to wait n watch before commenting further on this stock.
Dosc: Holding "NO Longs" in this stock. https://t.co/qGAnigXBB7
#TataSteel 1483/1367 #JSWSteel 733/664 #SAIL 128/112 #Nalco 86/71 https://t.co/ENmCqITEmA

Could be time to book out of large cap IT, if #Dxy continues to correct, fund flow could again chase risky assets #Banks #metals #midnsmall caps.
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) August 23, 2021
Just my observation.
Below todays lows on small cap index could be game over for now. But looks like a ABC corrective done
#Hindcopper 150/109 #Hindalco 450/399 #Vedl 307/260 #Hindustanzinc 345/293

#GPIL 1420/1084 #Sardaenergy 747 / 614 #JindalPowerSteel 428/357

You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x