Do y’all want Medicare for All or do you want to just keep talking about wanting Medicare for All
Wouldn’t it be cool to vote on Medicare for All if Democrats hold the House and Senate?
Are any of the people yelling about forcing a vote trying to help Dems win in Georgia?
I don’t understand what’s happening on the dirtbag left right now. I truly don’t.
Do y’all want Medicare for All or do you want to just keep talking about wanting Medicare for All
Why are you screaming at AOC and not screaming about Georgia?
Being contrarian and whipping up outrage is a brand for some of you.
But what do I know. I’m just a foreclosure lawyer who fell off a turnip truck
how serious can these people be about actually passing Medicare for all when they have said absolutely nothing about electing Dems in Georgia. Explain it to me like I’m 5.
Tweets for DAAAAAAAYS.
These folks make money by keeping people angry. 30k a month on patreon. 1.9 million dollar homes. So why would they help Dems win.
I’m just calling it like I see it.
They’re willing to work within the system. So it’s not me being a bootlicker asking them to work within the system in another way.
If not, then I’m not either
More from Health
No-regret #hydrogen:
Charting early steps for H₂ infrastructure in Europe.
👉Summary of conclusions of a new study by @AgoraEW @AFRY_global @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko (1/17)
https://t.co/YA50FA57Em
The idea behind this study is that future hydrogen demand is highly uncertain and we don’t want to spend tens of billions of euros to repurpose a network which won’t be needed. For instance, hydrogen in ground transport is a hotly debated topic https://t.co/RlnqDYVzpr (2/17)
Similar things can be said about heat. 40% of today’s industrial natural gas use in the EU goes to heat below 100°C and therefore is within range of electric heat pumps – whose performance factors far exceed 100%. (3/17)
Even for higher temperatures, a range of power-to-heat (PtH) options can be more energy-efficient than hydrogen and should be considered first. Available PtH technologies can cover all temperature levels needed in industrial production (e.g. electric arc furnace: 3500°C). (4/17)
In our view, hydrogen use for feedstock and chemical reactions is the only inescapable source of industrial hydrogen demand in Europe that does not lend itself to electrification. Examples include ammonia, steel, and petrochemical industries. (5/17)
Charting early steps for H₂ infrastructure in Europe.
👉Summary of conclusions of a new study by @AgoraEW @AFRY_global @Ma_Deutsch @gnievchenko (1/17)
https://t.co/YA50FA57Em
The idea behind this study is that future hydrogen demand is highly uncertain and we don’t want to spend tens of billions of euros to repurpose a network which won’t be needed. For instance, hydrogen in ground transport is a hotly debated topic https://t.co/RlnqDYVzpr (2/17)
Similar things can be said about heat. 40% of today’s industrial natural gas use in the EU goes to heat below 100°C and therefore is within range of electric heat pumps – whose performance factors far exceed 100%. (3/17)
Even for higher temperatures, a range of power-to-heat (PtH) options can be more energy-efficient than hydrogen and should be considered first. Available PtH technologies can cover all temperature levels needed in industrial production (e.g. electric arc furnace: 3500°C). (4/17)
In our view, hydrogen use for feedstock and chemical reactions is the only inescapable source of industrial hydrogen demand in Europe that does not lend itself to electrification. Examples include ammonia, steel, and petrochemical industries. (5/17)