Me: Made a thread about how people don't understand hyperacusis and give advice that obviously I've already tried.

This person only a few tweets into the thread:

I only tweeted this because, like it or not, this is the general population's reaction to me talking about hyperacusis.

Similar replies happened when there was the whole "not clapping" article regarding Cambridge.

They're so quick to label disabilities as not real disabilities.
It's important to remember this when people may ask why we've never talked about this before, or why it's not talked about a lot.

Most people don't talk about their hyperacusis because if they do, people respond like this. So most of the time, honestly it's easier to say nothing
Yes I am petty enough to add screenshots of this toxicity to this thread:
Asking for accessibility is "pathetic." /s : )
This isn't in the same tier as the others but I've gotten this multiple times & it's NOT true that there's a common feature in headsets that provides a max volume limiter. If they do exist, they're not common and they are very expensive ($150 or more). I have a "good headset."
1. Hyperacusis is -sorely- underdiagnosed for sure, especially among autistic people.

2. Having this feature helps many more people - people with PTSD, misophonia, HoH, etc.

3. Abled people would use this to reduce awful sounds.

3. People with "rare" disabilities still matter.
[alt-text: Your condition affects 1 in every 50,000 people. With a hit game of 1 million players, the lack of volume sliders will affect 20 people. I can understand why the developers had not considered your condition when making the game, and the fix may never be priority sadly]
Lol 😂😂 I think maybe I should start a counter of how many times I'm going to get this one? I've already gotten it at least twice.

More from Health

1/16
Why do B12 and folate deficiencies lead to HUGE red blood cells?

And, if the issue is DNA synthesis, why are red blood cells (which don't have DNA) the key cell line affected?

For answers, we'll have to go back a few billion years.


2/
RNA came first. Then, ~3-4 billion years ago, DNA emerged.

Among their differences:
🔹RNA contains uracil
🔹DNA contains thymine

But why does DNA contains thymine (T) instead of uracil (U)?

https://t.co/XlxT6cLLXg


3/
🔑Cytosine (C) can undergo spontaneous deamination to uracil (U).

In the RNA world, this meant that U could appear intensionally or unintentionally. This is clearly problematic. How can you repair RNA when you can't tell if something is an error?

https://t.co/bIZGviHBUc


4/
DNA's use of T instead of U means that spontaneous C → U deamination can be corrected without worry that an intentional U is being removed.

DNA requires greater stability than RNA so the transition to a thymine-based structure was beneficial.

https://t.co/bIZGviHBUc


5/
Let's return to megaloblastic anemia secondary to B12 or folate deficiency.

When either is severely deficient deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP*) production is hindered. With less dTMP, DNA synthesis is abnormal.

[*Note: thymine is the base in dTMP]

https://t.co/AnDUtKkbZh

You May Also Like