I do time's inbetween tweets, take the results, translate the time variations back to the boards. I'll explain and illustrate the best I can. This is gonna be a long one. We'll use the orthodox method, then I'll illustrate another re-read using "keys"?. Here we go!

Looking at 3rd Special Forces, these two. Both of these are Rt's. One done one the 13th at 10:04am. The next one is the same thing, diff time/org. A day before 12th, at 21:29.
So this is what the math looks like. Tools make it easier.
So 12 hours 35m is now drop 1235. Time variations as follows, 1258, 755, 453 (and 1235).
1235. Well just run across at face value. This lets you (the user) discern for themselves. I'll do my own interpertation (extra steps) after these face values.
1258 (23up from our previous) is this.
755. Just want to point out that 14th. If purposeful. These RT's are part of a plan that is in motion. Both done in the past to lead to a 14th delta (plus 3 months) Notice that L missing from the drop bottom? L=12 1,2=+3
Tried to illustrate the best I could.
I know 453 is listed I'll do an extra to thank peeps who look at these and to those who look at the drops/boards. 453[0] just added it in. Drop is such.
Back on track 453 is such. Again this is just face value I need to get a side by side going, comparison of time stamps, that delta (possible one) might have more to it.
@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll. If anyone spots erros, go ahead and get at me. It happens sometimes! (Again I'll try to do a breakdown later) Leave this as a preview.

More from Government

How does a government put a legislation on 'hold'? Is there any constitutional mechanism for the executive to 'pause' a validly passed legislation? Genuine Koshan.


So a committee of 'wise men/women' selected by the SC will stand in judgement over the law passed by


Here is the thing - a law can be stayed based on usual methods, it can be held unconstitutional based on violation of the Constitution. There is no shortcut to this based on the say so of even a large number of people, merely because they are loud.


Tomorrow can all the income tax payers also gather up at whichever maidan and ask for repealing the income tax law? It hurts us and we can protest quite loudly.

How can a law be stayed or over-turned based on the nuisance value of the protestors? It is anarchy to allow that.
This article by Jim Spellar for @LabourList misses the point about why Labour needs to think seriously about constitutional reform - and have a programme for it ready for government.


The state of our constitution is a bit like the state of the neglected electric wiring in an old house. If you are moving into the house, sorting it out is a bit tedious. Couldn’t you spend the time and money on a new sound system?

But if you ignore the wiring, you’ll find that you can’t safely install the new sound system. And your house may well catch fire.

Any programme for social democratic government requires a state with capacity, and a state that has clear mechanisms of accountability, for all the big and all the small decisions that in takes, in which people have confidence.

That is not a description of the modern UK state.

You May Also Like