https://t.co/q4focsfqlO
The Hawley-Cruz faction & most House GOP are now "Bleeding Kansas" Republicans:
I've been thinking about Kansas 1854-59 for a while.
Let's be clear about what happens when political parties reject elections and democracy:
Violence & bloodshed.
Thread.
The die is cast for the Republican Party. It will be destroyed on January 6th in much the same way the Whig party was destroyed by the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. The act unraveled the Missouri compromise and allowed for the westward expansion of slavery. 1/
— Steve Schmidt (@SteveSchmidtSES) January 3, 2021
https://t.co/q4focsfqlO
Pro-slavery Missourians moved west into Kansas to vote for the westward expansion of slavery.
https://t.co/Q3I8aVC9kt
For example, in the 1854 Kansas election, one district had 161 voters. 30 were legal residents. 131 were no legal residents.
Unlike today, there was voter fraud, and it destroyed the legitimacy of elections.
https://t.co/t0fzTQ4cjW

John Brown rise up as an anti-slavery violence in revenge, killing 5 in the Pottawatomie massacre, then leading 2 more armed battles that summer.
In 1855, anti-slavery forces seated their own govt at Topeka and drafted a free-state Topeka Constitution, vs the pro-slavery Lecompton Constitution.
Kansas had 2 rival governments.
Kansas was a turning point in the rise of the Republican Party, as it was clear that the US couldnt resolve "half slave/half free" in western expansion via local elections.
And the result was increasing violence and murder.
Because partisan racist politicians ignored the legally investigated evidence, rejected democracy and denied free & fair elections in favor of lies and slavery.
@HawleyMO @tedcruz and their anti-democratic axis are tearing apart their party and risking the republic...
@TTuberville @SenatorLankford @MarshaBlackburn @SenatorBraun are the descendants of the pro-slavery forces of the 1850s who rejected democracy & led to widespread domestic violence.
On Christmas, a man believing right-wing-adjacent conspiracy theories detonated a massive truck bomb in Nashville.
Worse is now foreseeable.
More from Government
You May Also Like
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]