On the face of it, this looks good, govt extending the Seasonal Agricultural Workers' visa scheme from 10,000 to 30,000 to address lack of labour for farming industry after the end of Free Movement.
Here's grinchy Zoe to explain why it's bad. Sorry...

Until now, most seasonal agricultural work was taken on by migrants benefitting from the right to Freedom of Movement in the EU. This meant they could come, pick on this farm, move to that farm with the changing harvest, switch into other work, basically just live.
With the end of Free Mov the Home Office insists less & less convincingly that all lower-paid work our industries need can be covered by the domestic work force.

The "pick for Britain" drive to get British workers into these jobs was a car wreck, filling just 15% of vacancies.
So, yes. There is an urgent need for an alternative source of probably migrant labour to pick, sort and package food on British farms from January.

Two years ago they introduced a pilot visa scheme for this, originally to bring over 2,500 workers for 6 months at a time.
One year ago they extended and expanded the "pilot" scheme to 10,000 workers. There was of course no evaluation of the pilot's success before this expansion, no consultation with expert groups, no evaluation of the risks of the scheme (which I'll explain, are many).
Knowing the "pilot" was due to end again we, with @NadiaWhittomeMP's help, submitted a parliamentary question asking what evaluation was to be carried out of the pilot scheme before it was expanded.

I mean, that is the meaning of a pilot scheme... right? https://t.co/kGmD7kRB1d
We asked, 1. what evaluation was being carried out & when would it be published? 2. what plans are in place to consult w migrant rights orgs (as required by the recommendations of the Windrush review, which the Home Office claims it is implementing...)

No prizes for the answer.
So what's the problem? Farms need these workers, don't they? Yes. They do. & farmers deserve a govt capable of providing a system where they can access the workers they need.

A good e.g. of a system like that was Free Movement. A system based on the rights of migrant workers.
The new seasonal agricultural worker's visa is, to put it mildly, not based on those rights.

It is a strictly time-limited visa, restricting workers to 6 months in and 6 months out of the country. It relies on workers being housed on-site in shared accommodation.
In a pandemic scenario, it's hardly surprising why this model didn't work particularly well, but even in normal times it entails serious risks.

A person accommodated at their work place & who must leave in 6-months is not a person empowered to challenge exploitative conditions.
A person who, regardless of circumstances, is turned into an overstayer and a criminal if they exceed 6 months in the country is at the mercy of traffickers and has no escape to get back on track or seek help if this happens.
2 companies run the Seasonal Workers Pilot scheme. On 25 February 2020, Stephanie Maurel, CEO of one of these, described in an MPI seminar I attended how they have taken extreme care to monitor the risk of exploitation & trafficking with in person interviews & inspections etc.
She stated that if the scheme were expanded much more it would be impossible to continue to provide the high level of monitoring required to guarantee the standards that they have so far.

The government is expanding the scheme without, as far as I know, hearing that evidence.
This scheme is unfit for purpose. It is a recipe guaranteed to produce exploited migrant labourers & to vastly increase the population of undocumented migrants in the country.

Calling it a pilot is a lie. There are no plans to publish any assessment, they're just barrelling on.
I know that there are a million & 1 ways the government is fucking up at the moment, and most of it seems a lot more dramatic than this, but this is about our rights, or food chain, our democracy and the right to scrutinise policies and develop them on the basis of evidence.
I don't know how to end this thread. It's depressing to try to use the mechanisms of our democracy to ensure people's rights are protected & to fail.

Why do they even bother to call it a pilot? So they can get away with another back-of-a-fag-packet scheme without consultation.

More from Government

The Government is making the same mistakes as it did in the first wave. Except with knowledge.

A thread.


The Government's strategy at the beginning of the pandemic was to 'cocoon' the vulnerable (e.g. those in care homes). This was a 'herd immunity' strategy. This interview is from


This strategy failed. It is impossible to 'cocoon' the vulnerable, as Covid is passed from younger people to older, more vulnerable people.

We can see this playing out through heatmaps. e.g. these heatmaps from the second


The Government then decided to change its strategy to 'preventing a second wave that overwhelms the NHS'. This was announced on 8 June in Parliament.

This is not the same as 'preventing a second wave'.

https://t.co/DPWiJbCKRm


The Academy of Medical Scientists published a report on 14 July 'Preparing for a Challenging Winter' commissioned by the Chief Scientific Adviser that set out what needed to be done in order to prevent a catastrophe over the winter
I don't normally do threads like this but I did want to provide some deeper thoughts on the below and why having a video game based on a real world war crime from the same people that received CIA funding isn't the best idea.

This will go pretty in depth FYI.


The core reason why I'm doing this thread is because:

1. It's clear the developers are marketing the game a certain way.

2. This is based on something that actually happened, a war crime no less. I don't have issues with shooter games in general ofc.

Firstly, It's important to acknowledge that the Iraq war was an illegal war, based on lies, a desire for regime change and control of resources in the region.

These were lies that people believed and still believe to this day.

It's also important to mention that the action taken by these aggressors is the reason there was a battle in Fallujah in the first place. People became resistance fighters because they were left with nothing but death and destruction all around them after the illegal invasion.

This is where one of the first red flags comes up.

The game is very much from an American point of view, as shown in the description.

When it mentions Iraqi civilians, it doesn't talk about them as victims, but mentions them as being pro US, fighting alongside them.

You May Also Like