Maina Files No Case Submission as EFCC Closes Case
As the ninth prosecution witness, Rouqayya Ibrahim rounded off her evidence-in-chief in the ongoing corruption trial of Abdulrasheed Maina, former Chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team,...
More from EFCC Nigeria
More from Fraud
🚨 SMARTMATIC + Venezuela = Election fraud disaster
@SidneyPowell1
CONTINUE⬇️
In a document found on Wikileaks:
“Smartmatic was founded in the late 90s by 3 Venezuelans, Antonio Mugica, Alberto Anzola, and Roger Pinate.
The electronic voting company went from a small technology startup to a market player in just a few
“Mugica has told Poloffs on several occasions that Anzola, Pinate, and he are the owners of Smartmatic, though they have a list of about 30 investors who remain anonymous.”
“Prior to 2004, SMARTMATIC had 0 election experience and otherwise was a fledgling business.
Reportedly critical to the SBC consortium’s award of the $91 mil 2004 recall election contract from the Chávez dominated CNE was a $150,000 + investment by the Venezuelan government”
https://t.co/zBeQryUqHw
@SidneyPowell1
CONTINUE⬇️
In a document found on Wikileaks:
“Smartmatic was founded in the late 90s by 3 Venezuelans, Antonio Mugica, Alberto Anzola, and Roger Pinate.
The electronic voting company went from a small technology startup to a market player in just a few
“Mugica has told Poloffs on several occasions that Anzola, Pinate, and he are the owners of Smartmatic, though they have a list of about 30 investors who remain anonymous.”
“Prior to 2004, SMARTMATIC had 0 election experience and otherwise was a fledgling business.
Reportedly critical to the SBC consortium’s award of the $91 mil 2004 recall election contract from the Chávez dominated CNE was a $150,000 + investment by the Venezuelan government”
https://t.co/zBeQryUqHw
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?