If you’ve donated to @BorahaeFunds, I would suggest disputing with your bank account in hopes to get your money back and defund them. The amount of money they have... it’s a scam at this point if they’re going against donors/@BTS_twt wishes of funding Life Goes On.
More from Fraud
2018
"Bribery and corruption in the NHS ‘being underreported"
The NHSCFA calculated that fraud costs the NHS £1.29bn each year, in its annual report and accounts – enough to pay for more than 40,000 staff nurses or to buy 5,000 ambulances."
1.
https://t.co/DY4GBHNrxN
— Duncan J Campbell (@Maven1967) December 17, 2020
2014
"NHS finance chief sacked over \u2018irregularities\u2019 at hospital"
Checks uncovered evidence one-off income was misrepresented in accounts in a practice dating back beyond 2013-14, predicted cost savings were over-stated at \xa36m when they amounted to \xa32m. pic.twitter.com/LHZHeJcXfE
2.
https://t.co/7T8RGTWE7x
— Duncan J Campbell (@Maven1967) December 17, 2020
"NHS errors 'deliberately hidden' The NHS has "failed" to hold anyone to account for a large scale financial mismanagement at a local trust, a damning report has concluded".
3.
https://t.co/kiTv4Ei5gg
— Duncan J Campbell (@Maven1967) December 17, 2020
2018
"The NHS Tayside board was misled'' over the state of the organisation's finances A review carried out by accountants Grant Thornton found that since 2012 the health board had misrepresented'' its financial performance by holding'' \xa35.3 million". pic.twitter.com/k9K72NlxGd
https://t.co/YPfXciseV0
4.
2017
Hey Canada, can we talk about how Conservatives are fundraising based on dangerous lies & how it needs to stop immediately? #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/2LSHcJtsMf
— \U0001f142\U0001f130\U0001f13c\U0001f138 (@samifouad) January 8, 2021
I covered two of the best-known cases in recent years: “robocalls” in 2011 election and the “in-and-out” affair of 2006. You probably heard a lot about the former and maybe nothing of the latter. Both were important for different reasons. 2/
In robocalls, the Conservative party’s voter-tracking database, CIMS, was used to make fraudulent automated calls to about 7,000 identified Liberal voters in Guelph, Ontario, directing them to the wrong polling location. The scheme didn’t work. The Liberals won the riding. 3/
Elections Canada caught on to the scheme on the day the calls were made, election day, and began investigating almost immediately. The long and complex investigation found the calls originated with someone working for the Conservative candidate in Guelph. 4/
After a trial, a lone campaign staffer was found guilty. He served jail time. The judge said it appeared to him others were likely involved but no one else was charged. Throughout, the CPC denied any knowledge of the scheme. 5/
You May Also Like
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw