BREAKING NEWS / DEVELOPING
Significant 3-Year Delta, Tomorrow!
18 posts to consider.
CHECKMATE inbound.
THREAD.
BIG news week?
Future proves past
..
NOTHING is a coincidence.
..
PATIENCE
THERE IS NO ESCAPE.
THERE ARE NO DEALS.
TREASON AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS
FOREIGN AGENTS WI|THIN OUR GOVERNMENT.
THE PUPPET MASTERS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
...
Do you TRUST the US Military?
Do you TRUST the Chain of Command?
Have FAITH - WE ARE IN CONTROL.
..
YOU WERE CHOSEN FOR A REASON.
Jeremiah 29:11 [ESV]
11) For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare[a] and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.
https://t.co/tYDodo846P
[Moar FUTURE PROVES PAST]
Have you not discovered the CONFIRMED correlation between posts here and Tweets yet?
https://t.co/MT7mC2JjZR
Who benefits from silencing the voice or Julian Assange?
— :111% :I-AM:SOVEREIGN-INNATE :BENJA{R}M1N-A:BOCK-~ (@BenjaminABock) January 10, 2021
Jan 12: @JulianAssange
Jan 13: "Checkmate" 3 year Delta
Jan 14: ?https://t.co/VkvetT3hTA pic.twitter.com/42u4XSMBvQ
Upcoming three year delta for Wednesday, Jan. 13th, 2021.
— :111% :I-AM:SOVEREIGN-INNATE :BENJA{R}M1N-A:BOCK-~ (@BenjaminABock) January 12, 2021
Checkmate used two other times.
Suggested: read all three year deltas from Jan. 2018 pic.twitter.com/yobyU2De4y
"countermoves" … Q proof confirmed. Will "death blossom" be employed? DECLAS!
https://t.co/YDaa2NujzQ
More from For later read
There is some valuable analysis in this report, but on the defense front this report is deeply flawed. There are other sections of value in report but, candidly, I don't think it helps us think through critical question of Taiwan defense issues in clear & well-grounded way. 1/
Normally as it might seem churlish to be so critical, but @cfr is so high-profile & the co-authors so distinguished I think it’s key to be clear. If not, people - including in Beijing - could get the wrong idea & this report could do real harm if influential on defense issues. 2/
BLUF: The defense discussion in this report does not engage at the depth needed to add to this critical debate. Accordingly conclusions in report are ill-founded - & in key parts harmful/misleading, esp that US shldnt be prepared defend Taiwan directly (alongside own efforts). 3/
The root of the problem is that report doesn't engage w the real debate on TWN defense issues or, frankly, the facts as knowable in public. Perhaps the most direct proof of this: The citations. There is nothing in the citations to @DeptofDefense China Military Power Report...4/
Nor to vast majority of leading informed sources on this like Ochmanek, the @RANDCorporation Scorecard, @CNAS, etc. This is esp salient b/c co-authors by their own admission have v little insight into contemporary military issues. & both last served in govt in Bush 43. 5/
This is an excellent report, and I'm glad to have joined the study group. The central focus on avoiding war is understandable--a US-China war would be catastrophic and should be avoided. But protecting Taiwan's security and prosperity requires doing more. 1/x https://t.co/P0Sg4LJcpV
— Bonnie Glaser / \u845b\u4f86\u5100 (@BonnieGlaser) February 12, 2021
Normally as it might seem churlish to be so critical, but @cfr is so high-profile & the co-authors so distinguished I think it’s key to be clear. If not, people - including in Beijing - could get the wrong idea & this report could do real harm if influential on defense issues. 2/
BLUF: The defense discussion in this report does not engage at the depth needed to add to this critical debate. Accordingly conclusions in report are ill-founded - & in key parts harmful/misleading, esp that US shldnt be prepared defend Taiwan directly (alongside own efforts). 3/
The root of the problem is that report doesn't engage w the real debate on TWN defense issues or, frankly, the facts as knowable in public. Perhaps the most direct proof of this: The citations. There is nothing in the citations to @DeptofDefense China Military Power Report...4/
Nor to vast majority of leading informed sources on this like Ochmanek, the @RANDCorporation Scorecard, @CNAS, etc. This is esp salient b/c co-authors by their own admission have v little insight into contemporary military issues. & both last served in govt in Bush 43. 5/
You May Also Like
Oh my Goodness!!!
I might have a panic attack due to excitement!!
Read this thread to the end...I just had an epiphany and my mind is blown. Actually, more than blown. More like OBLITERATED! This is the thing! This is the thing that will blow the entire thing out of the water!
Has this man been concealing his true identity?
Is this man a supposed 'dead' Seal Team Six soldier?
Witness protection to be kept safe until the right moment when all will be revealed?!
Who ELSE is alive that may have faked their death/gone into witness protection?
Were "golden tickets" inside the envelopes??
Are these "golden tickets" going to lead to their ultimate undoing?
Review crumbs on the board re: 'gold'.
#SEALTeam6 Trump re-tweeted this.
I might have a panic attack due to excitement!!
Read this thread to the end...I just had an epiphany and my mind is blown. Actually, more than blown. More like OBLITERATED! This is the thing! This is the thing that will blow the entire thing out of the water!
Tik Tok pic.twitter.com/8X3oMxvncP
— Scotty Mar10 (@Allenma15086871) December 29, 2020
Has this man been concealing his true identity?
Is this man a supposed 'dead' Seal Team Six soldier?
Witness protection to be kept safe until the right moment when all will be revealed?!
Who ELSE is alive that may have faked their death/gone into witness protection?
Were "golden tickets" inside the envelopes??
Are these "golden tickets" going to lead to their ultimate undoing?
Review crumbs on the board re: 'gold'.
#SEALTeam6 Trump re-tweeted this.
