👉 “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), & that such interactions may be involved in pathology & infectivity.” 👉👉👉👉 EVALI 👉 COVID-19 👇https://t.co/cCdTJiZzQZ

\u201cNo one substance has been identified in all of the samples tested. Importantly, identifying any compounds that are present in the samples will be one piece of the puzzle but will not necessarily answer questions about what is causing these illnesses.\u201d https://t.co/97UpfKIOqY
— Renaissance Man (@2dedostesta) September 10, 2020
\U0001f449 \u201cSARS-CoV-2 spike protein may interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), & that such interactions may be involved in pathology & infectivity.\u201d \U0001f449\U0001f449\U0001f449\U0001f449 EVALI \U0001f449 COVID-19 \U0001f447https://t.co/cCdTJiZzQZ pic.twitter.com/Vc8lwKCuH8
— Covid Fact Check \u270c\ufe0f (@2dedostesta2) February 24, 2021

2019 \U0001f449 EVALI was COVID-19 \U0001f449 Imaging of Vaping-Associated Lung Disease \U0001f449 https://t.co/zn0Er2Z3va \U0001f449 Detection of COVID-19 using CXR and CT images \U0001f449 https://t.co/w7wZBGRnvL https://t.co/nSCE1F61vP pic.twitter.com/UkMJu5iyW4
— qwert (@qwert03118543) January 27, 2021

\U0001f449 on Dec 13th 2019 \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 had > than 6 MILLION people with SARS-COV-2 antibodies \U0001f449 2%\u203c\ufe0f\U0001f447
— Covid Fact Check \u270c\ufe0f (@2dedostesta2) February 25, 2021
https://t.co/mHJnt2Nnjm
👉These findings suggest that 👉SARS-CoV-2 may have been introduced into the 🇺🇸 👉prior to January 19, 2020‼️
👉 2016 👉 PULITZER ‼️


SARS-CoV-2 through nAChRs may dysregulate the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway.
Interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike with nAChRs is due to a “toxin-like” sequence. https://t.co/oVGkoKIPKp


“the RBD (...) interact with TCRs.”
“the same segment bears close similarity to the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 SAg motif F164 to V174.” https://t.co/zqGd8m28mM
“possible that a poor initial antibody response to the virus fails to neutralize the SAg, as recently shown in MIS-C patients, leading to immune enhancement following reexposure.”
“potential genetic component to susceptibility.”
Can I get my Pulitzer now ❓
Latency ❓ Pulitzer ❓
\u201chigh propensity of the SARS-CoV-2 S TCRV\u03b2-binding site residues potentially elicit an SAg-like response.\u201d
— Covid Fact Check \u270c\ufe0f (@2dedostesta2) March 6, 2021
\u201cthe RBD (...) interact with TCRs.\u201d
\u201cthe same segment bears close similarity to the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 SAg motif F164 to V174.\u201d https://t.co/zqGd8m28mM
to dissect the immunopathology of inflammatory diseases.” 👇https://t.co/cLuJYLUUyk

\U0001f449 \u201cSARS-CoV-2 spike protein may interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), & that such interactions may be involved in pathology & infectivity.\u201d \U0001f449\U0001f449\U0001f449\U0001f449 EVALI \U0001f449 COVID-19 \U0001f447https://t.co/cCdTJiZzQZ pic.twitter.com/Vc8lwKCuH8
— Covid Fact Check \u270c\ufe0f (@2dedostesta2) February 24, 2021
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has submitted his answers to questions from special counsel Robert Mueller
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) November 20, 2018
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.