The way the club has got into this mess is of course mismanagement going back years, but we are where we are.

Dont expect to much vs Chelsea, but BHA and WB they need results, or frankly he's gone, and then what.
As much as i want to blame the owners, they have overseen an overhaul that has given much if not all of the shaping of the club over to Edu. So yes, its on them, but its also on him, and frankly he has been inept.
First one that needs to be shown the door, and if you sack MA then Edu needs to be gone at the same time. Someone on the board, who is based in this country needs to be appointed to oversee with checks and balances on whats going on.
Edu allowed the shaping of the squad in the summer, trying to ostracise players so that they leave and then of course they dont, has allowed for a situation that off field, players have taken sides. This has seeped through the squad and the club is broken because of it.
So much is seeping out of Colney now that its a situation that cant go on. The club need to show the door to players on Jan 1, not Jan 10, or Jan 28th on JAN 1 - pay them off and be gone.
Nobody is paying money for these players, and if the club isnt willing to do that, then frankly this process of backing the manager is meaningless, he will be gone because events will take over.
That will be 4 managers that many of these players will have seen the back of. Nows the time the club sees the back of these players.
Why are they even training with the 1st team anyway, What good is set piece routines if Ozil, or Sok, or Saliba is involved in them if there is no chance said players will be playing with the other players on a matchday.
And not in anyway advocating that the manager is not at major fault here.
If the goalkeeper last night is good enough, and of course he isn't, and should never represent us again then so you would have thought was Saliba. Why no ESR from the start, who with one pass forward did more than any of our MF have done this season.
Why was the summer allowed to fall apart with no creative midfielder being brought in, thats at Edu's door? Again, though had plenty of time to sign players from his own agents stable, and over rewards said players. 4yrs for a backup full back??
This is as dire situation as ive seen at the club going back to the 80's. Players treading water, not caring and actively undermining this manager and previous ones, with an owner who has overseen as the majority shareholder the degradation of club to where we are now.
So now what, scrape round for loans for Jan? Who can even advocate spending money if we dont even know the manager will be there at the end of Jan, let alone a new manager not wanting the previous managers signings.
It does always take time, but in general people get found out, Mark Hughes and Kia at City and QPR anyone?
Sven walked out when he saw what he was dealing with, ook at what he's delivered up where he is now. In turn we brought in a marketing man from Barcelona who paid £72m for player (not his fault) probably worth £25m,& has people wondering where was the oversight on that transfer!
So, simple choice now, back him and remove the issues straight away, or sack him, and then what, and more importantly who, as we may as well just wait for the summer for a new man if they wont action whats needed on the player front in Jan.

More from Education

This seems like a positive base from which to #BuildBackBetter


https://t.co/OwpgNh8mEu


https://t.co/7eOi1Bv3bM


https://t.co/GhxVgLuWJE


https://t.co/ymHp910wrC

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.