2/
https://t.co/SR9PioFNHd
Misinterpretation of surveillance data is a serious issue. Surveillance data needs to come with a warning label - Open to biases - interpret with caution! Some may not realize that surveillance often does not measure all infection, it's a proxy for actual disease incidence.
— Andrew Lee (@andrewleedr) February 14, 2021
1/
The science shows us that most disease transmission does not happen in the walls of the school, but it comes in from the community. So, CDC is advocating to get our K-5 students back in school at least in a hybrid mode with universal mask wearing and 6 ft of distancing. https://t.co/dfvJ2nl2s4
— Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH (@CDCDirector) February 14, 2021
Preprint of Welsh study studying staff-pupil #SARSCoV2 infections in schools between Aug-Dec'20. They report total number of infected staff & pupils within a school following re-opening wasn't associated with an increased subsequent risk of testing positive in staff or pupils.1/ https://t.co/w8pBpxbz3b
— Andrew Lee (@andrewleedr) February 8, 2021
Study in @PNASNews of COVID19 aerosol generation:
— Andrew Lee (@andrewleedr) February 13, 2021
- 18% of subjects accounted for 80% of exhaled aerosol
- significant correlations were observed between exhaled aerosol, age, & BMI
- all subjects <26 y of age & all subjects under 22
BMI were low spreaders of exhaled bioaerosol https://t.co/eAkTiKDbyk
Dutch study finds kids<12y infected with COVID19 have significantly lower viral loads than adults. 16-fold difference vs elderly.
— Andrew Lee (@andrewleedr) February 3, 2021
SARS-CoV-2 viral load distribution reveals that viral loads increase with agehttps://t.co/6phqzVbwYY
8. Back to the role of community transmission. The CDC's focus on this is consistent with our own modeling work. Keeping transmission down in the community is the best way to keep it down in the schools. Figure from v.1 of our paper at https://t.co/WLVXv8hYcg pic.twitter.com/AyKKW3bfEH
— Carl T. Bergstrom (@CT_Bergstrom) February 12, 2021
I have seen some repeated assertions about the evidence on #COVID19, children and schools recently which sound convincing, but unfortunately are false
— Alasdair Munro (@apsmunro) February 18, 2021
It is a sensitive and important topic, which is important to get right
Shall we bust some myths? \U0001f4a5
Let's go!
1/10
I have seen some repeated assertions about the evidence on #COVID19, children and schools recently which sound convincing, but unfortunately are false
— Alasdair Munro (@apsmunro) February 18, 2021
It is a sensitive and important topic, which is important to get right
Shall we bust some myths? \U0001f4a5
Let's go!
1/10
Why is it such a source of collective outrage that a person with fatigue following a viral illness gets better?https://t.co/5lcwQBPLU5
— Trisha Greenhalgh \U0001f637 #CovidIsAirborne (@trishgreenhalgh) January 30, 2021
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw