Apollo Hospital👇 https://t.co/3TReZvM53C
Next Tweet on stocks for 1-4 weeks
— Pramod Sharma\U0001f549\ufe0f\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@itspramods) April 14, 2022
All will be my top bet
Working start now.
Disclaimer: Not a recommendation at all.
More from Pramod Sharma🕉️🇮🇳
Conditions
rsi >50
RSI avove ma60
Price above ema 60
It is for indicators lovers.. i see rarely but as per my experience enough setup if one is follow with descipline
rsi >50
RSI avove ma60
Price above ema 60
ITC
— Pramod Sharma\U0001f549\ufe0f\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@itspramods) March 29, 2022
Try this combo RSI 60 period on 60 min chart
Backtest and tell me result.
Rsi/ma crossover abovev50 level pic.twitter.com/In3xrgWQz0
It is for indicators lovers.. i see rarely but as per my experience enough setup if one is follow with descipline
More from Divis
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
