1/ Who were the earliest women converts to Islam and what was their experience of conversion?

In our new sourcebook, Sean Anthony (@shahanSean) and Keren Abbou Hershkovitz profile several women who were alive at the Prophet's time #ConversionToIslam

https://t.co/00XpFCjXtP

2/ In the first entry, @shahanSean translates and comments on the conversion of the Prophet's first wife Khadīja as portrayed in one of the earliest and most famous biographies, the Kitāb al-Maghāzī of Ibn Isḥāq (d. 767)
3/ According to tradition, Khadīja was a widow and wealthy merchant of Mecca, who married Muḥammad after initially hiring him as her agent. She was reportedly the first person to believe in his prophethood, underlining the centrality of women in the Prophet's life
4/ Ibn Isḥāq tells us that when Muḥammad first received the revelation from Gabriel, he came to Khadīja frightened and confused. She reassured him, "God would never allow anything but good to befall you, for I know you are a man who only speaks the truth...
5/ "Rejoice and remain steadfast! By Him whose hand Khadīja's soul resides, I hope that you will be the prophet of his people (umma)!"

Khadīja then consulted with her cousin Waraqa, a Christian, who verified that Muḥammad's experience was true.
6/ He said to her, "Holy! Holy! By Him in whose hand my soul resides, if you have told me the truth, Khadīja, then he is a prophet! Let him be steadfast!"
7/ Abbou Hershovitz then profiles women converts in the great biographical dictionary of Ibn Saʿd (d. 845), the Ṭabaqāt. One is the Prophet's paternal aunt Arwā. Interestingly, only one of his paternal uncles became Muslim (Ḥamza), whereas several of his aunts did
8/ Arwā's brother was the Prophet's uncle and fierce opponent Abū Lahab. She tried to convince him to convert as well, saying, "Take the side [of Muḥammad]... If he is victorious, you will have the choice of either joining him or keeping your religion...
9/ "If he fails, you will have an excuse as he [is a relative]."

In other words, for Arwā, conversion was about building strategic social ties; family loyalty was everything.
10/ Stay tuned for more highlights from our sourcebook in the coming days and weeks!

The Editors (Nimrod Hurvitz, Christian Sahner, Uriel Simonsohn @culXl8fYioHzt8O, and Luke Yarbrough) @ucpress

More from Culture

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x

You May Also Like