Thread on best books + readers to learn Sanskrit. I will list only books I have read & their pros and cons.

1. Samskrita Bharati (4 Part Series)

This is by far the best structured english course to learn to read, speak & write Sanskrit. The material is well-structured.

... and grammar is introduced at apt phases. There is enough Sanskrit text to immerse yourself & best part is they have accompanying online/in-person courses entirely in Sanskrit. This is the best method to learn spoken Sanskrit.

https://t.co/ObBUHIijl6
2. Svayam Sanskrit Shikshak (Hindi)

This is the second best immersive-learning series. There are 2 parts and progression is gradual. The advantage is it is entirely in Hindi, so the 1:1 syntax + vocab connect for native speakers is instant, Hindi being a daughter of Sanskrit.
this however is also it's only disadvantange. It's language restricted & not suitable for say a Telugu with poor Hindi or for an American or European learner. There is enough reading material here to "learn" Sanskrit.

https://t.co/YphIWzXpNX
3. The Sanskrit Language – Walter H Maurer

This is an amazing course. The best to learn Sanskrit for Americans/Europeans & an excellent one for Indians to use to learn the western grammar terminology. Best part about it? It is extremley long & has at least 100 pages of Sanskrit.
100~ pages of pure Sanskrit with progressions from Ch 1 to Ch 32. Part 2 is a direct story from the Mahabharata with glossary given. So Part 1 starts with basic stories & by part 30 you're reading real literature. I vouch for this course, its the next best self-learner.
4. Cambridge Introduction to Sanskrit –– AM Ruppel

This is a recent book, so very updated with amazing font + brevity. The grammar is explained beautifully, but in much more detail than Deshpande's book (down below). Disadvantage? Just not enough Sanskrit reading.
Although, this book also has a very nice accompanying official website + video series on grammar by Dr. Ruppel.

Website: https://t.co/tRcyVG8fTq

Video Series: https://t.co/zifnEHWwVJ
5. Sanskrit Primer (saṃskṛtasubodhinī) – Dr. Deshpande

This book is great for learning Sanskrit with the traditional western grammar terminology. It is conscise & grammar focused. It is like a handy reference for grammar concepts. Disadvantage? Not enough reading.
This book contains grammar concepts summarized very concisely but lacks the sheer amount of reading progression needed to learn to read Sanskrit fluently.

Advantage? It has an accompanying website: https://t.co/PXn11mHCG3 (not run by Prof. Deshpande)
6. Devavāṇīpraveśika – Goldman and Goldman

This is the best western course so far. It's biggest advantage? It explains every single grammatical concept in full depth and uses Pāṇinian AND Western terminology. It also has enough readings. (at the end too). I vouch for it.
I even own a physical copy. So why isn't this the first book recommended? Well, it is extremley difficult for the beginner. You will simply give up or progress very slow with it. But it is excellent for the intermediate learner who is familiar with Sanskrit already.
So which one should you begin with? Well, with Samskrita Bharati. You will need the guidance. If you’re a trained western linguist, I recommend Whitney’s Grammar + Maurer’s Reader.

The real answer, if you get serious about Sanskrit, you should read them all eventually.
Now that you’ve studied grammar enough, the next part is reading original literature with crutches. We use readers for this. So a reader of the Ramayana has text from it + glossary of words & grammatical meaning. I find them helpful.

1) Rāmopākhyāna - Peter Scharff
2) Sanskrit Reader - Lanmann

This is the second best reader. It is old but good. Selections from many varieties of original literature from Mahabharata to Rigveda.
Once you have finished all of this, the best thing to do is start reading the Gita in it’s original Sanskrit. Finish it and move on to the Ramayana. They are both in straightforward language.

There is one good reader for the Gita, linking it down below.

Has glossary of verse

More from Indian History

More from Culture

Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.
@bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by
@BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW #Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission. @BloomsburyPub @Tim_Hayward_


1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:

2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. https://t.co/QtAAyH9WyX… @RobertF40396660


3) This act of attempted deception was only derailed because an inspector discovered the secret changes. The manipulations were reported by @ClarkeMicah
and can be readily observed in documents now available https://t.co/2BUNlD8ZUv….

4) @bellingcat's book also makes no mention of the @couragefoundation panel, attended by the @opcw's first Director General, Jose Bustani, at which an OPCW official detailed key procedural irregularities and scientific flaws with the Final Douma Report:
. THREAD 1/x

David Baddiel is getting lots of coverage and feedback on his book which again focuses on so called 'left wing' antisemitism.

I will start by saying that I have seen antisemitic comments made by Labour members and some genuine cases.

However, I have huge concerns.


2/x

Let's look in detail at this article written in April 2019 in the @Guardian - and I will explain the concerns.

The areas highlighted guide you to believe this was all Labour - IT WASN'T.

It also occurred before 2015! Detail follows...

https://t.co/cK59FP83aG


3/x

So as you see the writer of this rather deceitful piece starts with

"THAT CHANGED IN SEPTEMBER 2015" 🙄

This was done to point the timeframe as Corbyn's leadership. Yet the article goes on to describe things that are not even related to Labour, which occurred in 2014.


4/x

So... What in fact the @Guardian writer is discussing here is this case - where a group of Neo-Nazi's spent months inflicting abuse on Jewish MP Luciana Berger

All the detail is in the Court Notes when Bonehill-Paine was sentenced by the judge.

https://t.co/wAyo6Yro5Q


5/x

The Justice sentencing remarks to Neo-Nazi explain the previous cases too. See the date 2014.

Yet the Guardian writer refers to this NON LABOUR case to effectively make her article a lie.

"Star of David" - this was Garron Helm another neo-Nazi..

You May Also Like