I'm creating a recommended book list for students of South Asian history and politics.

What do you think should be on it?

- "Annihilation of Caste" by BR Ambedkar
- "Walking With the Comrades" by Arundhati Roy
- "Hindutva" by VD Savarkar
- "Slavery" by Jyotirao Phule
- "Mogul India" by Niccolao Manucci
- "Sketch of the Sikhs" by John Malcolm
- "Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi" by Mohandas Gandhi
- "The Mughal Throne" by Abraham Eraly
- "Aurangzeb" by Audrey Truschke
- "What Gandhi and Congress Have Done to Untouchables" by BR Ambedkar
- "A History of the Sikhs" by Joseph Davey Cunningham
- "Travels in the Mogul Empire" by François Bernier
- "City of Djinns" by William Dalrymple
- "A Free Man" by Aman Sethi
- "Ants Among Elephants" by Sujatha Gidla
- "Jahangir's India" by Francisco Pelsaert
- "The Sikhs in History" by Sangat Singh
- "We or Our Nationhood Defined" by MS Golwalkar
- "War at the Top of the World" by Eric Margolis
- "The Argumentative Indian" by Amartya Sen
- "The Age of Kali" by William Dalrymple
- "The Temptations of the West" by Pankaj Mishra
- "For Reasons of State" by John Dayal
- "The Punjab" by Henry Steinbach
- "Collected Works of Periyar EVR" by EV Ramasamy
- "BJP vis-à-vis Hindu Resurgence" by Koenraad Elst
- "Hindu Society Under Siege" by Sita Ram Goal
- "A Place at the Multicultural Table" by Prema Kurien
- "Hindu Nationalism in India" by Dibyesh Anand
- "Amritsar" by Mark Tully
- "Untouchable" by Mulk Raj Anand
- "In the Shade of the Swastika" by Marzia Casolari
- "Hitler's Priestess" by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
- "Time for Stock Taking" by Sita Ram Goel
- "Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History" by VD Savarkar
- "Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects" by Mridu Rai
- "The Clash Within" by Martha Nussbaum
- "Hindu Rashtra Darshan" by VD Savarkar
- "Dr. Ambedkar and Untouchability" by Christophe Jaffrelot
- "Politics After Television" by Arvind Rajagopal
- "Shahjahanabad" by Rana Safvi
- "A Feast of Vultures" by Josy Joseph
- "The Saffron Wave" by Thomas Blom Hansen
- "Being the Other" by Saeed Naqvi
- "Shades of Saffron" by Saba Naqvi
- "Gujarat Files" by Rana Ayyub
- "Hindu Nationalism" by Chetan Bhatt
- "The Indian Ideology" by Perry Anderson
- "The RSS" by AG Noorani
- "Brotherhood in Saffron" by Walter Andersen and Shridhar Damle
- "Uncle Swami" by Vijay Prashad
- "Spirit of the Sikh" by Puran Singh
- "A Concise History of Modern India" by Barbara and Thomas Metcalf
- "The Valiant" by Gurmeet Kaur
- "Violent Conjunctures in Democratic India" by Amrita Basu
- "Bhai Maharaj Singh" by ML Ahluwalia
- "The Hindu Nationalist Reader" by Christophe Jaffrelot
- "Looking Away" by Harsh Mander
- "The Human Toll of the Kashmir Conlict" by Shubh Mathur
- "Who Killed Karkare?" by SM Mushrif
- "Sicques, Tigers or Thieves" ed. by Amandeep Singh Madra and P Singh
- "Bunch of Thoughts" by MS Golwalkar
- "Listening to Grasshoppers" by Arundhati Roy
- "Early Indians" by Tony Joseph
- "The History of India" by Mountstuart Elphinstone

More from Culture

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
॥ॐ॥
अस्य श्री गायत्री ध्यान श्लोक:
(gAyatri dhyAna shlOka)
• This shloka to meditate personified form of वेदमाता गायत्री was given by Bhagwaan Brahma to Sage yAgnavalkya (याज्ञवल्क्य).

• 14th shloka of गायत्री कवचम् which is taken from वशिष्ठ संहिता, goes as follows..


• मुक्ता-विद्रुम-हेम-नील धवलच्छायैर्मुखस्त्रीक्षणै:।
muktA vidruma hEma nIla dhavalachhAyaiH mukhaistrlkShaNaiH.

• युक्तामिन्दुकला-निबद्धमुकुटां तत्वार्थवर्णात्मिकाम्॥
yuktAmindukalA nibaddha makutAm tatvArtha varNAtmikam.

• गायत्रीं वरदाभयाङ्कुश कशां शुभ्रं कपालं गदाम्।
gAyatrIm vardAbhayANkusha kashAm shubhram kapAlam gadAm.

• शंखं चक्रमथारविन्दयुगलं हस्तैर्वहन्ती भजै॥
shankham chakramathArvinda yugalam hastairvahantIm bhajE.

This shloka describes the form of वेदमाता गायत्री.

• It says, "She has five faces which shine with the colours of a Pearl 'मुक्ता', Coral 'विद्रुम', Gold 'हेम्', Sapphire 'नील्', & a Diamond 'धवलम्'.

• These five faces are symbolic of the five primordial elements called पञ्चमहाभूत:' which makes up the entire existence.

• These are the elements of SPACE, FIRE, WIND, EARTH & WATER.

• All these five faces shine with three eyes 'त्रिक्षणै:'.